Skip to content

(MODULES-11807) add EL10 basic support - align EL10 PGSQL 16 default package version#1672

Closed
SugatD wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
MODULES-11807-pr1650
Closed

(MODULES-11807) add EL10 basic support - align EL10 PGSQL 16 default package version#1672
SugatD wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
MODULES-11807-pr1650

Conversation

@SugatD

@SugatD SugatD commented May 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR is created to execute tests for the original PR (#1650)

@jst-cyr

jst-cyr commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@SugatD : The original maintainer has updated their code to try to resolve the acceptance issues. Can we update this branch again and retest so we can provide additional feedback?

@SugatD SugatD force-pushed the MODULES-11807-pr1650 branch from e746361 to 825b47a Compare June 23, 2026 05:20
@SugatD

SugatD commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jst-cyr Updated this branch with the maintainer's latest commits from #1650 (EL10 fail() guard in dnfmodule.pp, the EL10→PG16 default in globals.pp, EL10 metadata entries, and the server_instance_spec.rb guard restricted to EL8/9) and re-ran acceptance.

The RHEL-10 acceptance tests now pass — both RedHat-10 and RedHat-10-arm are green, where the run previously failed on server_instance_spec.rb trying to run dnf module enable postgresql:16 on EL10. RedHat-8/9 and the rest of the EL8/EL9 family (CentOS, Oracle, Rocky, Alma) also remain green.

The remaining 4 failures are unrelated to this change:

  • CentOS-7 / Scientific-7 / OracleLinux-7 (EOL EL7) — the PostgreSQL service fails to start in the Litmus container (Connection refused on port 5432), which cascades into the dependent examples. Environmental, not a regression from the EL10 work.
  • Debian-13 — a new platform unrelated to the EL10 support added here.

So the EL10 acceptance issue flagged earlier is resolved. Ready for additional feedback.

…package version

Co-authored-by: Matt Darcy <matt@projecthugo.co.uk>
@SugatD SugatD force-pushed the MODULES-11807-pr1650 branch from 825b47a to 68c3743 Compare June 24, 2026 08:27
@SugatD

SugatD commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing this PR as the #1650 is merged

@SugatD SugatD closed this Jun 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants