Skip to content

Add algorithms for F_LOWER_BOUND and F_UPPER_BOUND as Simple FB#2373

Open
franz-hoepfinger-4diac wants to merge 1 commit intoeclipse-4diac:developfrom
franz-hoepfinger-4diac:feature/a7
Open

Add algorithms for F_LOWER_BOUND and F_UPPER_BOUND as Simple FB#2373
franz-hoepfinger-4diac wants to merge 1 commit intoeclipse-4diac:developfrom
franz-hoepfinger-4diac:feature/a7

Conversation

@franz-hoepfinger-4diac
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@franz-hoepfinger-4diac franz-hoepfinger-4diac commented Apr 8, 2026

We agreed to make IEC 61131-3 FBs as Simple FBs here: #2082 (review)

this PR converts these 2 into a Simple FB.

#2046 (comment) the Question is if "select" should stay as Package, or better "array" ?

references:
#2342
#2046

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Apr 8, 2026

Test Results

  110 files  ±0    110 suites  ±0   1m 9s ⏱️ -1s
6 131 tests ±0  6 131 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
6 132 runs  ±0  6 132 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9980618. ± Comparison against base commit 75af61a.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@diplfranzhoepfinger
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@diplfranzhoepfinger
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

diplfranzhoepfinger commented Apr 11, 2026

#2332 (review) Should we provide a default value for the dimension so that users that want to work with 1 dimensional arrays do not need to set a value. I think this is the main use case and would make the usage of the block much easier.

image

--> i did already.

Reclassify F_LOWER_BOUND and F_UPPER_BOUND into arrays package
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants