refactor: fix extracted_statements.c naming to follow HACKING.md conventions#1325
refactor: fix extracted_statements.c naming to follow HACKING.md conventions#1325
Conversation
…entions Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <[email protected]>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR refactors the DuckDB extracted statements extension by renaming internal C functions and the module initialization entry point, removing the redundant "duckdb_" prefix from function names across three files. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary
duckdb_extracted_statements__initialize→extracted_statements__initialize(Rule 2)duckdb_extracted_statements_destroy→extracted_statements_destroy(Rule 1)duckdb_extracted_statements_size→extracted_statements_size(Rule 1)duckdb_extracted_statements_prepared_statement→extracted_statements_prepared_statement(Rule 1)rbduckdb_init_duckdb_extracted_statements→rbduckdb_init_extracted_statements(Rule 10)extracted_statements.handduckdb.ccaller accordinglyTest plan
bundle exec rake test— 1102 runs, 0 failures, 0 errors🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit