Skip to content

Conversation

@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot commented Jan 6, 2026

This PR updates TypeScript declarations for the @stdlib/utils namespace.

Reviewer Checklist

  • Check the scope of the changes (following Conventional Commits):
    • Are these new APIs? Then this is a feat.
    • Are these changes to existing APIs that could break compatibility? Then this is a feat! (i.e., a breaking change).
    • Are these only documentation changes to existing APIs? Then this is docs.
  • Update the PR title to align with the change type (feat, feat!, or docs).
  • Approve the PR once you are confident about the classification and changes made.

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation. automated-pr Automated pull request (e.g., from a bot). labels Jan 6, 2026
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot requested a review from a team January 6, 2026 02:50
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
utils $\color{red}43705/59577$
$\color{green}+73.36%$
$\color{red}731/771$
$\color{green}+94.81%$
$\color{red}22/494$
$\color{green}+4.45%$
$\color{red}43705/59577$
$\color{green}+73.36%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@kgryte kgryte changed the title feat: update utils TypeScript declarations docs: update examples Jan 6, 2026
@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Jan 6, 2026

The CI failure should now be addressed via upstream changes in develop. The next time utils is updated CI should hopefully be fully green.

@kgryte kgryte merged commit 363aead into develop Jan 6, 2026
100 of 101 checks passed
@kgryte kgryte deleted the update-utils-declarations branch January 6, 2026 03:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

automated-pr Automated pull request (e.g., from a bot). Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants