Skip to content

Update plugin com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin to v2.6.0#2335

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin-2.x
Open

Update plugin com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin to v2.6.0#2335
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin-2.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented Apr 3, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin 2.4.02.6.0 age confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.16%. Comparing base (4dbfd37) to head (7711494).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #2335   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     82.15%   82.16%           
- Complexity     4824     4827    +3     
=========================================
  Files           472      472           
  Lines         15040    15040           
  Branches       1908     1908           
=========================================
+ Hits          12356    12357    +1     
  Misses         1991     1991           
+ Partials        693      692    -1     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@testlens-app

This comment has been minimized.

@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update plugin com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin to v2.5.0 Update plugin com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin to v2.6.0 Apr 9, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin-2.x branch from d995921 to 3b99ef9 Compare April 9, 2026 19:11
@testlens-app

This comment has been minimized.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin-2.x branch from 3b99ef9 to 5ed2088 Compare April 9, 2026 22:15
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin-2.x branch from 5ed2088 to e89158d Compare May 7, 2026 09:21
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin-2.x branch from e89158d to 7711494 Compare May 7, 2026 13:08
@testlens-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

testlens-app Bot commented May 7, 2026

🚨 TestLens detected 1 failed tests 🚨

Here is what you can do:

  1. Inspect the test failures carefully.
  2. If you are convinced that some of the tests are flaky, you can mute them below.
  3. Finally, trigger a rerun by checking the rerun checkbox.

Test Summary

Check Project/Task Test Runs
Verify Branches and PRs / Build and Verify (4.0, 8, windows-latest) :spock-specs:test BlockingVariablesSpec > failing example 1 - variable has wrong value

🏷️ Commit: 7711494
▶️ Tests: 85152 executed
⚪️ Checks: 61/61 completed

Test Failure

BlockingVariablesSpec > failing example 1 - variable has wrong value (:spock-specs:test in Verify Branches and PRs / Build and Verify (4.0, 8, windows-latest))
Expected exception of type 'org.spockframework.runtime.ConditionNotSatisfiedError', but got 'org.spockframework.runtime.SpockTimeoutError'
	at org.spockframework.runtime.extension.builtin.FailsWithInterceptor.intercept(FailsWithInterceptor.java:44)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.extension.MethodInvocation.proceed(MethodInvocation.java:139)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.extension.builtin.TimeoutInterceptor.intercept(TimeoutInterceptor.java:98)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.extension.MethodInvocation.proceed(MethodInvocation.java:139)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.model.MethodInfo.invoke(MethodInfo.java:157)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.model.MethodInfo.invoke(MethodInfo.java:157)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doJoin(ForkJoinTask.java:389)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.join(ForkJoinTask.java:719)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.model.MethodInfo.invoke(MethodInfo.java:157)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doJoin(ForkJoinTask.java:389)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.join(ForkJoinTask.java:719)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1056)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1692)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:175)
Caused by: BlockingVariable.get() timed out after 1.00 seconds
	at spock.util.concurrent.BlockingVariable.get(BlockingVariable.java:113)
	at spock.util.concurrent.BlockingVariablesImpl.get(BlockingVariablesImpl.java:35)
	at spock.util.concurrent.BlockingVariables.getProperty(BlockingVariables.groovy:110)
	at spock.util.concurrent.BlockingVariablesSpec.failing example 1 - variable has wrong value(BlockingVariablesSpec.groovy:63)

Muted Tests

Select tests to mute in this pull request:

  • BlockingVariablesSpec > failing example 1 - variable has wrong value

Reuse successful test results:

  • ♻️ Only rerun the tests that failed or were muted before

Click the checkbox to trigger a rerun:

  • Rerun jobs

Learn more about TestLens at testlens.app.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants