Skip to content

[202505] Adding support for queue and priority-group watermarks#605

Open
mramezani95 wants to merge 2 commits intosonic-net:202505from
mramezani95:mramezani/periodic_pg_watermarks_202505
Open

[202505] Adding support for queue and priority-group watermarks#605
mramezani95 wants to merge 2 commits intosonic-net:202505from
mramezani95:mramezani/periodic_pg_watermarks_202505

Conversation

@mramezani95
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why I did it

This PR adds virtual paths for queue and priority-group watermarks so that they can be queried using gNMI.

How I did it

Ported changes in the following PRs from master to 202505:
#370
#403

How to verify it

Run the provided tests.

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111

Description for the changelog

Adding support for queue and priority-group watermarks

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

N/A

Signed-off-by: Mahdi Ramezani <mramezani@microsoft.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mramezani95
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Signed-off-by: Mahdi Ramezani <mramezani@microsoft.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@kperumalbfn
Copy link
Copy Markdown

kperumalbfn commented Apr 15, 2026

@yejianquan @jianyuewu could you please merge to 202505.

@jianyuewu jianyuewu requested a review from stephenxs April 16, 2026 01:26
@jianyuewu
Copy link
Copy Markdown

jianyuewu commented Apr 16, 2026

That's good, thanks, also add Stephen for help @stephenxs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants