Conversation
Reviewer's GuideIntroduces two new GitHub Action workflows to integrate the Claude AI assistant for automated code reviews on pull requests and for on-demand AI-driven interactions when explicitly mentioned, each configured with custom triggers, permissions, checkout steps, and calls to the anthropics/claude-code-action. Sequence diagram for Claude Code Review workflow on pull requestsequenceDiagram
participant GitHub
participant "Claude Code Review Workflow"
participant "actions/checkout@v4"
participant "anthropics/claude-code-action@v1"
participant "Claude AI"
GitHub->>"Claude Code Review Workflow": Trigger on PR opened/synchronize
"Claude Code Review Workflow"->>"actions/checkout@v4": Checkout repository
"Claude Code Review Workflow"->>"anthropics/claude-code-action@v1": Run code review action
"anthropics/claude-code-action@v1"->>"Claude AI": Review PR and provide feedback
"Claude AI"->>GitHub: Post review comment on PR
Sequence diagram for Claude Code workflow on @claude mentionsequenceDiagram
participant GitHub
participant "Claude Code Workflow"
participant "actions/checkout@v4"
participant "anthropics/claude-code-action@v1"
participant "Claude AI"
GitHub->>"Claude Code Workflow": Trigger on comment/review/issue with @claude
"Claude Code Workflow"->>"actions/checkout@v4": Checkout repository
"Claude Code Workflow"->>"anthropics/claude-code-action@v1": Run Claude action
"anthropics/claude-code-action@v1"->>"Claude AI": Process request
"Claude AI"->>GitHub: Respond to comment/issue
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughTwo new GitHub Actions workflows integrate Claude for automated and interactive code reviews. The first triggers automatically on pull requests to perform code reviews, while the second enables on-demand Claude interactions via comments. The LICENSE copyright year is updated to 2025. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User as User/PR
participant GHA as GitHub Actions
participant Claude as Claude Code Action
participant GH as GitHub API
rect rgb(200, 220, 255)
Note over GHA,Claude: claude-code-review.yml (Automatic)
User->>GHA: PR opened/updated
GHA->>Claude: Trigger with PR context
Claude->>Claude: Analyze code quality,<br/>bugs, performance, security
Claude->>GH: Post review comments
GH->>User: Display feedback
end
rect rgb(220, 200, 255)
Note over GHA,Claude: claude.yml (Interactive)
User->>GH: Comment with @claude
GHA->>GHA: Detect @claude trigger
GHA->>Claude: Invoke with comment/context
Claude->>GH: Reply with assistance
GH->>User: Display response
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Blocking issues:
- An action sourced from a third-party repository on GitHub is not pinned to a full length commit SHA. Pinning an action to a full length commit SHA is currently the only way to use an action as an immutable release. Pinning to a particular SHA helps mitigate the risk of a bad actor adding a backdoor to the action's repository, as they would need to generate a SHA-1 collision for a valid Git object payload. (link)
- An action sourced from a third-party repository on GitHub is not pinned to a full length commit SHA. Pinning an action to a full length commit SHA is currently the only way to use an action as an immutable release. Pinning to a particular SHA helps mitigate the risk of a bad actor adding a backdoor to the action's repository, as they would need to generate a SHA-1 collision for a valid Git object payload. (link)
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location> `.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml:36` </location>
<code_context>
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**security (yaml.github-actions.security.third-party-action-not-pinned-to-commit-sha):** An action sourced from a third-party repository on GitHub is not pinned to a full length commit SHA. Pinning an action to a full length commit SHA is currently the only way to use an action as an immutable release. Pinning to a particular SHA helps mitigate the risk of a bad actor adding a backdoor to the action's repository, as they would need to generate a SHA-1 collision for a valid Git object payload.
*Source: opengrep*
</issue_to_address>
### Comment 2
<location> `.github/workflows/claude.yml:35` </location>
<code_context>
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**security (yaml.github-actions.security.third-party-action-not-pinned-to-commit-sha):** An action sourced from a third-party repository on GitHub is not pinned to a full length commit SHA. Pinning an action to a full length commit SHA is currently the only way to use an action as an immutable release. Pinning to a particular SHA helps mitigate the risk of a bad actor adding a backdoor to the action's repository, as they would need to generate a SHA-1 collision for a valid Git object payload.
*Source: opengrep*
</issue_to_address>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
|
|
||
| - name: Run Claude Code Review | ||
| id: claude-review | ||
| uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
security (yaml.github-actions.security.third-party-action-not-pinned-to-commit-sha): An action sourced from a third-party repository on GitHub is not pinned to a full length commit SHA. Pinning an action to a full length commit SHA is currently the only way to use an action as an immutable release. Pinning to a particular SHA helps mitigate the risk of a bad actor adding a backdoor to the action's repository, as they would need to generate a SHA-1 collision for a valid Git object payload.
Source: opengrep
|
|
||
| - name: Run Claude Code | ||
| id: claude | ||
| uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
security (yaml.github-actions.security.third-party-action-not-pinned-to-commit-sha): An action sourced from a third-party repository on GitHub is not pinned to a full length commit SHA. Pinning an action to a full length commit SHA is currently the only way to use an action as an immutable release. Pinning to a particular SHA helps mitigate the risk of a bad actor adding a backdoor to the action's repository, as they would need to generate a SHA-1 collision for a valid Git object payload.
Source: opengrep
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 1.x #120 +/- ##
===========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
- Complexity 106 130 +24
===========================================
Files 14 13 -1
Lines 275 283 +8
===========================================
+ Hits 275 283 +8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml (1)
3-5: Consider adding rate limiting or conditions to prevent unnecessary workflow runs.The workflow triggers on every PR open/synchronize without conditional filtering. On an active repository, this could lead to many Claude API calls. Consider adding:
- Conditional filters based on PR author (commented option at lines 15-19)
- File path filters (commented option at lines 7-11)
- Exclusion of draft PRs or specific labels
This would make the workflow more cost-effective and targeted.
.github/workflows/claude.yml (1)
33-37: Action verified as available and maintained; document setup requirements for contributors.The anthropics/claude-code-action@v1 is actively maintained with v1.0.9 released Sep 27, 2025, and is GA-status. However, no CONTRIBUTING.md or setup documentation was found in the repository. The workflow depends on
secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKENbeing pre-configured—add documentation to guide contributors through this setup requirement.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/claude.yml(1 hunks)LICENSE(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: ci / PHPUnit - PHP 8.5 (windows-latest, highest)
- GitHub Check: Sourcery review
🔇 Additional comments (4)
LICENSE (1)
3-3: Copyright year updated correctly.The year range has been appropriately updated to reflect 2025.
.github/workflows/claude.yml (2)
1-50: Well-structured interactive Claude workflow.The on-demand design with @claude triggers is flexible and user-friendly. The optional prompt and claude_args customizations make it adaptable for different use cases.
15-19: Conditional logic verified—no issues found.The
ifcondition correctly handles all trigger events with appropriate field references:
issue_commentandpull_request_review_commentboth checkcomment.body✓pull_request_reviewchecksreview.body✓issueschecks bothissue.bodyandissue.title✓All event combinations will properly trigger Claude when @claude is detected.
.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml (1)
36-56: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1 is actively maintained.The action is maintained with published v1 releases and documentation from Anthropic, showing recent activity. The workflow correctly references this action. Ensure that
secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKENis configured in the repository settings before enabling this workflow on live PRs.
| - Security concerns | ||
| - Test coverage | ||
| Use the repository's CLAUDE.md for guidance on style and conventions. Be constructive and helpful in your feedback. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify CLAUDE.md exists in repository.
The prompt references "the repository's CLAUDE.md" for style guidance, but there's no confirmation this file exists. If it doesn't, Claude won't have style guidance and the review may be less consistent with project conventions.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if CLAUDE.md exists in repository
if [ -f "CLAUDE.md" ]; then
echo "✓ CLAUDE.md found at repository root"
head -20 CLAUDE.md
else
echo "✗ CLAUDE.md not found"
find . -name "CLAUDE.md" -type f 2>/dev/null || echo "No CLAUDE.md found anywhere"
fiLength of output: 21
---
🏁 Script executed:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to CLAUDE.md or guidance documentation in the codebase
echo "=== Searching for CLAUDE.md references ==="
rg -i "claude\.md" --type-list | head -20 || true
echo -e "\n=== Searching for style guide or conventions references ==="
rg -i "(style.*guide|coding.*standard|convention)" -C2 .github/workflows/ || true
echo -e "\n=== Checking for other documentation files ==="
fd -e md | grep -iE "(guide|style|convention|readme)" | head -20 || true
Length of output: 614
---
🏁 Script executed:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for CLAUDE.md references and documentation structure
echo "=== Searching for CLAUDE.md references ==="
rg "claude\.md" -i || echo "No CLAUDE.md references found"
echo -e "\n=== Listing all markdown files ==="
fd -e md | sort
echo -e "\n=== Checking workflow file content ==="
if [ -f ".github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml" ]; then
echo "Workflow file found:"
cat ".github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml"
else
echo "Workflow file not found at .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml"
find . -name "claude-code-review.yml" -type f 2>/dev/null || echo "No workflow file found"
fi
Length of output: 2200
Create CLAUDE.md or remove the reference from the workflow prompt.
The workflow explicitly instructs Claude to use "the repository's CLAUDE.md" for style guidance, but this file does not exist anywhere in the repository. This will cause Claude to lack guidance on style and conventions during code reviews.
Options to fix:
- Create CLAUDE.md at the repository root with your project's style guide and coding conventions
- Remove the CLAUDE.md reference from the prompt in the workflow and replace with inline guidance, or reference existing documentation (e.g., README.md)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml around line 50: the workflow references
a non-existent CLAUDE.md for style guidance which will break reviewer prompts;
either add a CLAUDE.md at repo root containing your style and convention
guidance, or remove/replace the reference in the workflow prompt with inline
guidance or an existing doc (e.g., README.md) so the workflow points to an
actual file or includes the needed guidance directly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if CLAUDE.md now exists in the repository
echo "=== Checking for CLAUDE.md in repository ==="
if [ -f "CLAUDE.md" ]; then
echo "✓ CLAUDE.md found at repository root"
echo ""
echo "=== File size and basic info ==="
ls -lh CLAUDE.md
echo ""
echo "=== First 30 lines of CLAUDE.md ==="
head -30 CLAUDE.md
else
echo "✗ CLAUDE.md not found at repository root"
echo ""
echo "=== Searching for CLAUDE.md anywhere in the repository ==="
find . -name "CLAUDE.md" -type f 2>/dev/null || echo "No CLAUDE.md found anywhere in repository"
fi
Length of output: 145
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check recent commits and git status to see if CLAUDE.md was added
echo "=== Checking recent commits in current branch ==="
git log --oneline -10
echo ""
echo "=== Checking for any CLAUDE.md in recent commits ==="
git log --all --oneline --name-only | grep -i "CLAUDE.md" || echo "No CLAUDE.md found in commit history"
echo ""
echo "=== Current branch ==="
git branch --show-current
echo ""
echo "=== All files in repository root ==="
ls -la | head -20
Length of output: 1908
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check which branch has CLAUDE.md and get its content
echo "=== Finding which branch(es) contain CLAUDE.md ==="
git branch -a --contains $(git log --all --format=%H --name-only | grep -B1 "^CLAUDE.md$" | head -1) 2>/dev/null || echo "Could not determine branch"
echo ""
echo "=== Checking commits that added CLAUDE.md ==="
git log --all --oneline --diff-filter=A -- CLAUDE.md
echo ""
echo "=== Getting CLAUDE.md content from the commit ==="
COMMIT_WITH_CLAUDE=$(git log --all --oneline --diff-filter=A -- CLAUDE.md | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f1)
if [ -n "$COMMIT_WITH_CLAUDE" ]; then
echo "Found CLAUDE.md in commit: $COMMIT_WITH_CLAUDE"
echo ""
echo "=== Content of CLAUDE.md ==="
git show $COMMIT_WITH_CLAUDE:CLAUDE.md | head -50
else
echo "Could not find commit with CLAUDE.md"
fi
echo ""
echo "=== Checking if it exists in origin/add-claude-github-actions-1761412869230 ==="
git ls-tree -r origin/add-claude-github-actions-1761412869230 --name-only | grep -i CLAUDE || echo "Not found in source branch"
Length of output: 3142
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if CLAUDE.md exists in the target branch (1.x)
echo "=== Checking for CLAUDE.md in origin/1.x (target branch) ==="
git ls-tree -r origin/1.x --name-only | grep -i CLAUDE
echo ""
echo "=== Getting CLAUDE.md from origin/1.x ==="
git show origin/1.x:CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null && echo "" && echo "✓ CLAUDE.md exists in target branch 1.x" || echo "✗ CLAUDE.md not found in 1.x"
echo ""
echo "=== Commit history for CLAUDE.md ==="
git log origin/1.x --oneline -- CLAUDE.md | head -5
Length of output: 6383
@koriym Perfect! I can confirm that CLAUDE.md exists in the target branch (1.x) and contains comprehensive guidance for Claude Code. The file includes:
- Project overview and architecture details
- Core compilation flow and runtime execution
- Development commands and testing instructions
- Key concepts like dependency indexing, injection points, and scope handling
- PHP version requirements and best practices
Since this PR is targeting the 1.x branch where CLAUDE.md already exists, the workflow will have access to the style guidance when it runs. The reference in line 50 of the workflow is valid and will work correctly! ✅
If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!
1 participant
Summary by Sourcery
Introduce two GitHub Action workflows to integrate the Claude AI action for automated code reviews and on-demand assistance via triggers in pull requests and issue comments.
New Features:
Summary by CodeRabbit