Open
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
This would be only really useful in conjunction with #1011. If #1011 is not accepted, a different design should be used for this feature. The reason is that |
Collaborator
|
We discussed this feature at the April '22 LDWG meeting.
|
Collaborator
|
@vgurevich especially, please take a look! |
Contributor
|
@jnfoster -- noted. I'll try to refactor some programs and at least compile them with p4-test backend. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Personnel
Design
Implementation
p4-spec: this PRp4c: Experimental support for typeof keyword p4c#3017Process
p4-spec:p4c: