README + gemspec: Required ruby ~> 1.9.3 #4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
Ist mir unklar. Hattest du nochmal das ops gem gebundeled? Mehr wüsste ich hier nicht zu tun. Zu den Autorenschaften: Ich hab das bisher so gesehen, dass man hier Credits für die Entwicklung aufnimmt. Daher habe ich mich damals zur Autorenliste hinzugefügt und Thomas drin gelassen. Du kannst gerne das gleiche machen, oder mich hinausnehmen - wie ihr wollt. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Doch noch mal als Pull-Request:
Habe das auch in ops.gemspec eingetragen (s.required_ruby_version = '~> 1.9.3'), allerdings taucht davon nichts in Gemfile.lock auf. Ist das richtig?