Skip to content

fix: Mismatch in Minimum iOS Deployment Target Between Airship SDK and mParticle Airship Kit#34

Merged
denischilik merged 1 commit intodevelopmentfrom
fix/SDKE-137-Mismatch-in-Minimum-iOS-Deployment-Target-Between-Airship-SDK-and-mParticle-Airship-Kit
Sep 15, 2025
Merged

fix: Mismatch in Minimum iOS Deployment Target Between Airship SDK and mParticle Airship Kit#34
denischilik merged 1 commit intodevelopmentfrom
fix/SDKE-137-Mismatch-in-Minimum-iOS-Deployment-Target-Between-Airship-SDK-and-mParticle-Airship-Kit

Conversation

@denischilik
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • bump-up swift-tools-version to 5.10 to support .v15
  • update platform to ios 15
  • use objc dependency to Airship "AirshipObjectiveC" our code consume classes which were removed from swift version of Airship
  • import obj classes

Testing Plan

  • Was this tested locally? If not, explain why.
  • {explain how this has been tested, and what, if any, additional testing should be done}

Reference Issue (For mParticle employees only. Ignore if you are an outside contributor)

- update platform to ios 15
- use objc dependency to Airship "AirshipObjectiveC" our code consume classes which were removed from swift version of Airship
- import obj classes
@denischilik denischilik changed the title SDKE-137: Mismatch in Minimum iOS Deployment Target Between Airship SDK and mParticle Airship Kit fix: SDKE-137: Mismatch in Minimum iOS Deployment Target Between Airship SDK and mParticle Airship Kit Sep 8, 2025
@denischilik denischilik changed the title fix: SDKE-137: Mismatch in Minimum iOS Deployment Target Between Airship SDK and mParticle Airship Kit fix: Mismatch in Minimum iOS Deployment Target Between Airship SDK and mParticle Airship Kit Sep 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@BrandonStalnaker BrandonStalnaker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@denischilik denischilik merged commit 8d6e90f into development Sep 15, 2025
17 of 24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants