Distributed compilation support for asm & preprocessor outputs

[AJIOB]

Fixes #2556

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 81.57895% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 71.08%. Comparing base (82bfa28) to head (24ef01e).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/compiler/compiler.rs	84.84%	5 Missing ⚠️
src/compiler/gcc.rs	60.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2557      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.07%   71.08%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          65       65              
  Lines       35737    35771      +34     
==========================================
+ Hits        25401    25429      +28     
- Misses      10336    10342       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ahartmetz]

Please, like last time: "preprocessor output" or "preprocessed input". Be nice to the people who are going to read what you write.

[AJIOB]

Please, like last time: "preprocessor output" or "preprocessed input". Be nice to the people who are going to read what you write.

Oops, thanks again

[AJIOB]

Hi @sylvestre ,

Is it OK for you?

Looks like I've finalized it

[AJIOB]

@sylvestre , is it OK?

Or you prefer to manually list all possible enum values twice?

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 5.28%

❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 53 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 2 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	time_macro_finder_chunked	971.9 µs	1,026.1 µs	-5.28%

---

_{Comparing AJIOB:fix-dist-asm (24ef01e) with main (82bfa28)}

Footnotes

1. 2 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[AJIOB]

Benchmark degrading is similar to another PRs, such as in #2521