Skip to content

🌱 Migrate from Requeue to RequeueAfter in kcp#13028

Merged
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
sivchari:migrate-kcp-requeue-to-requeueafter
Jan 14, 2026
Merged

🌱 Migrate from Requeue to RequeueAfter in kcp#13028
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
sivchari:migrate-kcp-requeue-to-requeueafter

Conversation

@sivchari
Copy link
Member

@sivchari sivchari commented Nov 21, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #12272

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Nov 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 21, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mix them without separating.

Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer Nov 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just intentionally added these in the PR merged yesterday. Please keep them (please see the godocs I explicitly added to the nolint statements)

(please revert all changes to this file, this util will soon'ish also be used in other controller / repos. It has to handle Requeue appropriately and must have the corresponding unit test coverage for it)

Copy link
Member

@neolit123 neolit123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
given this PR is a task from the parent issue.

@sivchari

  • how are we deciding on 10 seconds vs 20 seconds in various places?
  • should we add some constants in a central file?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 21, 2025
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer Nov 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just intentionally added these in the PR merged yesterday. Please keep them (please see the godocs I explicitly added to the nolint statements)

(please revert all changes to this file, this util will soon'ish also be used in other controller / repos. It has to handle Requeue appropriately and must have the corresponding unit test coverage for it)

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

sbueringer commented Nov 21, 2025

/hold

Until the findings are resolved

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 21, 2025
@sivchari sivchari force-pushed the migrate-kcp-requeue-to-requeueafter branch from 952c490 to be6829d Compare November 22, 2025 12:28
@sivchari
Copy link
Member Author

I addressed review findings.

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sivchari Looks like unit tests are failing :)

Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only reviewed the prod code. One finding for that

Signed-off-by: sivchari <shibuuuu5@gmail.com>
@sivchari sivchari force-pushed the migrate-kcp-requeue-to-requeueafter branch from be6829d to d92adfc Compare November 27, 2025 05:07
@sivchari
Copy link
Member Author

/area provider/control-plane-kubeadm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/provider/control-plane-kubeadm Issues or PRs related to KCP and removed do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Dec 19, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thank you very much!

/lgtm
/approve
/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 14, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 14, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

DetailsGit tree hash: b3a8a0ac15a16a36c8338a1f405e7321602ebc93

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: neolit123, sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [neolit123,sbueringer]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 37a3c0b into kubernetes-sigs:main Jan 14, 2026
23 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.13 milestone Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/control-plane-kubeadm Issues or PRs related to KCP cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Migrate away from CR result.Requeue

4 participants