Skip to content

Docs: minor README documentation update#22300

Closed
Subhadeepsen1 wants to merge 1 commit intokeras-team:masterfrom
Subhadeepsen1:first-keras-pr
Closed

Docs: minor README documentation update#22300
Subhadeepsen1 wants to merge 1 commit intokeras-team:masterfrom
Subhadeepsen1:first-keras-pr

Conversation

@Subhadeepsen1
Copy link

This PR makes a small documentation-only update to the README.

  • No code changes
  • No behavior changes
  • Documentation improvement only

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Feb 26, 2026

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Subhadeepsen1, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a minor documentation-only change to the project's README file. The primary goal is to enhance clarity and provide a more accurate description of the Keras 3 framework by refining its main title. This update has no impact on the codebase or its functionality.

Highlights

  • Documentation Update: Updated the main title in the README.md file to better reflect the project's nature, changing 'Deep Learning for Humans' to 'Deep Learning Toolkit for Humans'.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • README.md
    • Updated the main heading to 'Keras 3:Deep Learning Toolkit for Humans'.
Activity
  • No specific activity has been recorded for this pull request since its creation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request makes a minor documentation update to the README.md file, changing the title from "Deep Learning for Humans" to "Deep Learning Toolkit for Humans". This is a straightforward documentation improvement.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 26, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 77.04%. Comparing base (db4508d) to head (ca99cd6).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (db4508d) and HEAD (ca99cd6). Click for more details.

HEAD has 2 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (db4508d) HEAD (ca99cd6)
keras 5 4
keras-tensorflow 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #22300      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.94%   77.04%   -5.90%     
==========================================
  Files         594      594              
  Lines       65361    65361              
  Branches    10213    10213              
==========================================
- Hits        54211    50355    -3856     
- Misses       8526    12352    +3826     
- Partials     2624     2654      +30     
Flag Coverage Δ
keras 76.91% <ø> (-5.86%) ⬇️
keras-jax 61.23% <ø> (ø)
keras-numpy 55.42% <ø> (ø)
keras-openvino 38.88% <ø> (ø)
keras-tensorflow ?
keras-torch 61.34% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@hertschuh
Copy link
Collaborator

@Subhadeepsen1

"Deep learning for humans" is Keras' tagline. We don't want to change that.

@hertschuh hertschuh closed this Mar 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants