Add Ruby JSON schema validator in JSON schema Ecosystem#1506
Add Ruby JSON schema validator in JSON schema Ecosystem#1506benjagm merged 6 commits intojson-schema-org:mainfrom
Conversation
built with Refined Cloudflare Pages Action⚡ Cloudflare Pages Deployment
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1506 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 10 10
Lines 396 396
Branches 106 106
=========================================
Hits 396 396 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@DhairyaMajmudar, I only made changes to the tooling-data.yml file. The slug-page.tsx file was included in my pull request because I created the PR from the main branch. However, I’ve ensured that these changes won’t affect any existing code. Additionally, since my previous PR hasn’t been merged yet, its commits are also reflected in the main branch.
|
Hi @jagpreetrahi! Thanks a lot for your contribution! I noticed that the following required information is missing or incomplete: breaking changes information Please update the PR description to include this information. You can find placeholders in the PR template for these items. Thanks a lot! |
|
Hi @jagpreetrahi! Thanks a lot for your contribution! I noticed that the following required information is missing or incomplete: breaking changes information Please update the PR description to include this information. You can find placeholders in the PR template for these items. Thanks a lot! |
benjagm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed the issue and approved the PR. Thanks for your contributions.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Add Ruby JSON schema validator in JSON Ecosystem
Issue Number:
Screenshots/videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No