Conversation
A key bound like key:modal;modifier Behaves the way it always has: the modifier is applied to the key that enters modal mode. A key bound like key:modifier;modal Now behaves as follows: the modifier has to be pressed with the key that triggers the action while in modal mode. Of course, the two can also be combined: key:modifier1;modal;modifier2 behaves as you’d expect: modal mode is activated when `modal` is pressed along with `modifier2` and the command is executed if `key` is pressed along with `modifier1` while in modal mode. combinations followed by `:toggle` also work
Update README.md
|
+1 to this feature, though I would probably go with the format |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I believe one of your examples is missing a ; and has a , instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Both comma and semicolon are valid to separate modifiers from each other. This has always been the case and I didn’t want to change anything.
|
On Jun 27, 2013, at 12:37 AM, Hunter Haugen notifications@github.com wrote:
I agree that the syntax could be cleaner. Your suggestion, however, would break backwards compatibility: The format has always been for both modes. Where |
2 participants
Closes #247 as fixed