angular: use shared entities templates to generate UserManagement - #32516
Merged
Conversation
mshima
force-pushed
the
user-management-entity
branch
from
March 2, 2026 22:37
b620123 to
5619cff
Compare
6 tasks
DhairyasheelS
added a commit
to DhairyasheelS/DhairyasheelS-generator-jhipster
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2026
…TS files Per mshima's recommendation (based on jhipster#32516), only the 4 HTML files are customized for user-management; all other files (service, model, routes, list/detail/update/delete components and specs) now use standard entity templates without builtInUserManagement branches. - Delete 16 user-management-specific .ts.ejs/.spec.ts.ejs templates - Keep only 4 HTML override templates (list, detail, update, delete) - Remove builtInUserManagement dead branches from shared entity templates - Change utils.ts: skipClient: true -> !application.clientFrameworkAngular - Two-write approach in entity-files-angular.ts: standard templates first, then HTML overrides for user-management - Retain authorities() service method and authorities-related TS code as builtInUserManagement guards (see jhipster#32434) - Update generator snapshot Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
mshima
force-pushed
the
user-management-entity
branch
from
June 27, 2026 16:58
5619cff to
19e27d3
Compare
mshima
force-pushed
the
user-management-entity
branch
from
July 8, 2026 18:46
6bd0335 to
31215fc
Compare
mshima
force-pushed
the
user-management-entity
branch
from
July 22, 2026 17:51
31215fc to
cf187c1
Compare
mshima
force-pushed
the
user-management-entity
branch
from
August 19, 2026 19:39
cf187c1 to
5f7092e
Compare
mshima
force-pushed
the
user-management-entity
branch
4 times, most recently
from
August 26, 2026 20:28
799214c to
23918c2
Compare
mshima
force-pushed
the
user-management-entity
branch
from
August 27, 2026 00:43
23918c2 to
08babd4
Compare
mshima
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 27, 2026 15:44
mshima
marked this pull request as draft
August 27, 2026 16:33
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
mshima
force-pushed
the
user-management-entity
branch
from
August 28, 2026 19:32
b6d9ec6 to
7a8f085
Compare
Member
Author
|
There is a change in Boolean checkbox. |
mshima
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 29, 2026 03:01
DanielFran
approved these changes
Aug 29, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #31891
Please make sure the below checklist is followed for Pull Requests.
When you are still working on the PR, consider converting it to Draft (below reviewers) and adding
skip-cilabel, you can still see CI build result at your branch.