Update @tailwindcss/vite 4.1.12 → 4.2.2 (minor)#549
Open
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoproductionfrom
Open
Update @tailwindcss/vite 4.1.12 → 4.2.2 (minor)#549depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoproductionfrom
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoproductionfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ @tailwindcss/vite (4.1.12 → 4.2.2) · Repo · Changelog
Release Notes
4.2.2
4.2.1
4.2.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.
✳️ tailwindcss (4.1.12 → 4.2.2) · Repo · Changelog
Release Notes
4.2.2
4.2.1
4.2.0
4.1.18
4.1.17
4.1.16
4.1.15
4.1.14
4.1.13
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.
Release Notes
5.20.1
5.20.0
5.19.0
5.18.4
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 29 commits:
chore(release): new release (#493)chore: fix cspellci: fix logicci: trusted publishers (#492)ci: add node@25 (#491)chore(deps-dev): bump tooling from v1.24.4 to v1.25.0 (#489)chore(deps): bump actions/create-github-app-token from 2.2.1 to 3.0.0 in the dependencies group (#487)ci: dependabot automerge (#486)ci: use lock versions (#485)chore(deps): update (#484)fix(tsconfig): optimize TsconfigPathsPlugin and fix extends resolution bugs (#483)perf: improve resolver cache hit rate (#481)chore(release): 5.20.0chore(deps): bump minimatch (#478)feat(tsconfig): enable trailing comma support for JSONC (#479)fix(tsconfig): support JSONC comments in tsconfig.json files (#476)fix(tsconfig): detect circular extends to prevent infinite loop (#477)test: add null-byte escape test cases for '#' handling (#473)feat(tsconfig): add baseUrl option to override tsconfig baseUrl (#472)chore(release): 5.19.0chore: update eslint config webpack (#471)feat: added TsconfigPathsPlugin (replacement for tsconfig-paths-webpack-plugin) (#463)chore: migrate to npm from yarn (#469)chore(release): 5.18.4fix: support `file:` schema (#467)fix: allow subpath imports that start with `#/` (#468)fix(AliasPlugin): correct wildcard replacement in multi-target aliases (#465)fix: fix always-false condition (#464)fix: note the conditions under which the request couldn't be found (#460)Release Notes
2.6.1
2.6.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 17 commits:
chore(release): v2.6.1chore: remove unused codechore: update depsbuild: revert to `terser-webpack-plugin` (#407)fix(interop): only passthrough default if it is not a promise (#408)chore: update benchchore(release): v2.6.0perf: lazy load babel transform (#405)fix: always use native for `node:` specifiers (#392)fix(cjs-interop): handle function default exports (#396)build: migrate to rspack (#404)test: new bench scripttest: update deno and bun native test ignoreschore: update depschore(deps): update all non-major dependencies (#393)chore(deps): update actions/checkout action to v5 (#394)chore(deps): update actions/setup-node action to v5 (#399)Release Notes
0.30.21
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 16 commits:
chore: release v0.30.21chore: update repository urlchore: release v0.30.20chore: update depsci: setup OIDCchore: create release.ymlchore: update readme (#305)chore: release v0.30.19chore: update depsfix: this.outro need to be mapped (#300)feat: `replace(All)` support replacement for functions when the first parameter is a string (#304)chore: release v0.30.18chore: update package.json metachore: update depsfix: prevent infinite loop on empty input (#302)chore: update eslint configRelease Notes
2.3.2
2.3.1
2.3.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 14 commits:
chore(release): new release (#212)fix: a regression (#211)chore(release): new release (#209)ci: trusted publisher (#208)chore: update jest (#207)chore(deps-dev): bump the dependencies group with 4 updates (#203)chore(deps): bump codecov/codecov-action in the dependencies group (#202)chore: use locks for ci and dependabot update (#201)chore: deps update (#200)fix: ignore invalid before values (#198)fix: missing trim() for name when options is an object (#197)chore: migrate to npm (#196)chore(release): 2.3.0feat(types): added `TypedHookMap` type (#195)🆕 lightningcss-android-arm64 (added, 1.32.0)
🗑️ @isaacs/fs-minipass (removed)
🗑️ chownr (removed)
🗑️ minipass (removed)
🗑️ minizlib (removed)
🗑️ mkdirp (removed)
🗑️ tar (removed)
Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase.All Depfu comment commands