Skip to content

Conversation

@fengyuchuanshen
Copy link

@fengyuchuanshen fengyuchuanshen commented Nov 4, 2025

fix some typos in comments

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected minor typos in guidance documentation and internal comments for improved clarity.

Signed-off-by: fengyuchuanshen <[email protected]>
@cocogitto-bot
Copy link

cocogitto-bot bot commented Nov 4, 2025

✔️ e5a3655 - Conventional commits check succeeded.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request corrects spelling errors in comments and documentation across three files. Changes include typo fixes in guide text ("contians" to "contains"), CLI documentation ("explicity" to "explicitly"), and scaffold entry type definitions ("attemting" to "attempting"). All modifications are cosmetic with no functional impact.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation typos
guides/manual-testing.md
Fixed spelling errors: "contians" → "contains" in guidance text
Code comment typos
src/cli.rs, src/scaffold/entry_type/definitions.rs
Corrected spelling in comments: "explicity" → "explicitly" in CLI documentation and "attemting" → "attempting" in scaffold definitions

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • All changes are isolated spelling corrections in comments and documentation
  • No functional or behavioral modifications
  • Straightforward verification of typo corrections

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore: fix some typos in comments' directly and accurately reflects the main changes across all files—correcting typos in comments and documentation text.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9edcbc3 and e5a3655.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • guides/manual-testing.md (1 hunks)
  • src/cli.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/scaffold/entry_type/definitions.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-10-06T11:03:04.848Z
Learnt from: ThetaSinner
Repo: holochain/scaffolding PR: 512
File: src/versions.rs:10-11
Timestamp: 2025-10-06T11:03:04.848Z
Learning: Dev versions (e.g., 0.7.0-dev.17) for Holochain dependencies like hdi, hdk, and holochain are published to crates.io and are valid for use in scaffolding.

Applied to files:

  • guides/manual-testing.md
📚 Learning: 2025-10-03T13:56:51.989Z
Learnt from: ThetaSinner
Repo: holochain/scaffolding PR: 512
File: templates/generic/web-app/package.json.hbs:26-26
Timestamp: 2025-10-03T13:56:51.989Z
Learning: The Holochain scaffolding tool does not support Windows environments, so cross-platform compatibility concerns for Windows can be disregarded.

Applied to files:

  • guides/manual-testing.md
🔇 Additional comments (3)
guides/manual-testing.md (1)

31-31: Typo fix looks good.

Corrected spelling in user-facing documentation.

src/scaffold/entry_type/definitions.rs (1)

299-300: Typo fix looks good.

Corrected spelling in code comment.

src/cli.rs (1)

71-73: Typo fix looks good.

Corrected spelling in code comment.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Member

@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you

@ThetaSinner
Copy link
Member

This would require rebasing, would you be able to do that please?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants