Skip to content

Delete algebraic axioms#2112

Open
Negabinary wants to merge 2 commits intowrite-stepsfrom
delete-axioms
Open

Delete algebraic axioms#2112
Negabinary wants to merge 2 commits intowrite-stepsfrom
delete-axioms

Conversation

@Negabinary
Copy link
Contributor

Remove the algebraic axioms, because they are redundant with the algebra option and might cause confusion.

@cyrus- cyrus- changed the base branch from dev to write-steps February 5, 2026 21:34
@Negabinary Negabinary force-pushed the delete-axioms branch 2 times, most recently from 9fca178 to fab9fe5 Compare February 10, 2026 16:30
@Negabinary Negabinary force-pushed the delete-axioms branch 2 times, most recently from 2ae7d15 to 2655dc6 Compare February 12, 2026 20:08
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.59%. Comparing base (862b8a2) to head (b2db72c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           write-steps    #2112      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        49.85%   49.59%   -0.26%     
===============================================
  Files              232      232              
  Lines            25727    25593     -134     
===============================================
- Hits             12825    12694     -131     
+ Misses           12902    12899       -3     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/language/proof/Axioms.re 100.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 13 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments