Update Rust crate time to v0.3.46

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
time (source)	workspace.dependencies	patch	0.3.44 -> 0.3.46

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

time-rs/time (time)

v0.3.46

Compare Source

Added

• All possible panics are now documented for the relevant methods.

• The need to use #[serde(default)] when using custom serde formats is documented. This applies
  only when deserializing an Option<T>.

• Duration::nanoseconds_i128 has been made public, mirroring
  std::time::Duration::from_nanos_u128.

• Various methods for truncating components have been added, avoiding the need to call the fallible
  replace methods multiple times.

  For PrimitiveDateTime, UtcDateTime, and OffsetDateTime:

  • truncate_to_day

  For Time, PrimitiveDateTime, UtcDateTime, and OffsetDateTime:

  • truncate_to_hour
  • truncate_to_minute
  • truncate_to_second
  • truncate_to_millisecond
  • truncate_to_microsecond

Changed

• The minimum supported Rust version is now 1.88.0.
• Significant performance gains in numerous locations. No public APIs were changed or removed as
  part of this.
• The size of error::ComponentRange, along with types that contain it, has been significantly
  reduced.

Fixed

• The PartialOrd and Ord implementations of UtcOffset now return the expected result.

v0.3.45

Compare Source

Added

• time::format_description::StaticFormatDescription type alias for &'static [BorrowedFormatItem<'static>]. This is the type returned by the
  time::macros::format_description! macro.

Changed

• The minimum supported Rust version is now 1.83.0.
• All floating point methods on Duration are now const fn.
• All setters on Parsed are now const fn.
• The serde dependency has been replaced with serde_core, This reduces compile times by not
  including unused parts of serde.
• Date::from_julian_day uses a new algorithm, resulting in an approximately 16% performance
  improvement. This method is used internally by numerous other methods.
• util::is_leap_year uses a new algorithm, resulting in an approximately 8% performance
  improvement.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Dependency updates (lockfile-only)

• Bumps time from 0.3.44 to 0.3.46 (Cargo.lock)
• Updates related crates: time-core (0.1.8), time-macros (0.2.26), num-conv (0.2.0)
• time now depends on serde_core instead of serde

No source changes; scope limited to dependency resolution.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9c5fe29. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust time crate dependency from 0.3.44 to 0.3.45 (Renovate bump).

Notes: This PR only updates the lockfile; there are no application/source code changes included.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.19%. Comparing base (8625667) to head (9c5fe29).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8272   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.19%   60.19%           
=======================================
  Files        1232     1232           
  Lines      118007   118007           
  Branches     5135     5135           
=======================================
  Hits        71029    71029           
  Misses      46152    46152           
  Partials      826      826           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.14% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.77% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

_{Comparing deps/rs/time-0.x-lockfile (9c5fe29) with main (8625667)}

Summary

✅ 18 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run¹

Footnotes

1. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

[TimDiekmann]

Requesting changes to prevent Renovate spamming me with failed merges. Feel free to dismiss when resolved.

error: failed to resolve: could not find `ContentVisitor` in `de`
   ┌─ libs/@local/graph/temporal-versioning/src/temporal_bound.rs:11:21
   │
11 │ #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize)]
   │                     ^^^^^^^^^^^
   │
   ┌─ /home/runner/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-1949cf8c6b5b557f/serde-1.0.228/src/private/de.rs:12:10
   │
12 │ #[cfg(any(feature = "std", feature = "alloc"))]
   │          ------------------------------------ found an item that was configured out
   │
   ┌─ /home/runner/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-1949cf8c6b5b557f/serde-1.0.228/src/private/de.rs:14:75
   │
14 │     content_as_str, Content, ContentDeserializer, ContentRefDeserializer, ContentVisitor,
   │                                                                           -------------- found an item that was configured out
   │

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Review	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 24, 2026 4:29am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 24, 2026 4:29am

Your organization requires reapproval when changes are made, so Graphite has dismissed approvals. See the output of git range-diff at https://github.com/hashintel/hash/actions/runs/21309170162

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.739 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.849 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.425 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 141 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.975 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-21.188 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$5.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-74.441 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$18.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-32.886 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.053 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.597 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.270 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.383 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.026 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$39.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$76.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 410 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.388 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$53.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$414 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.04 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.453 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$96.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 479 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$84.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.965 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$318 \mathrm{ms} \pm 939 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$31.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$32.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$31.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.781 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.830 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$46.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$94.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 389 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$69.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$75.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$50.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 407 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$78.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 458 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.996 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$57.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 424 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.614 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.243 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 387 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.775 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 512 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 565 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$38.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.793 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$577 \mathrm{ms} \pm 973 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.500 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph