Skip to content

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Jan 2, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
rust major 2025-12-22 -> 2026-01-12

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 11am" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge January 2, 2026 08:12
@hash-worker hash-worker bot requested a review from a team January 2, 2026 08:12
@cursor
Copy link

cursor bot commented Jan 2, 2026

PR Summary

Modernizes REST response handling and updates toolchain.

  • Introduces BoxedResponse in rest/status.rs; updates status_to_response, report_to_response, and JSON extractor rejection to use it
  • Refactors REST handlers across data_type, entity, entity_type, property_type, permissions, principal, and test-server to return BoxedResponse; cleans up related imports
  • Adjusts RestApiStore::load_external_type and entity query helpers to return BoxedResponse
  • Updates Rust toolchain to nightly-2026-01-12 and refreshes README badges

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit d0e58c4. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) area/libs > error-stack Affects the `error-stack` crate (library) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) labels Jan 2, 2026
@augmentcode
Copy link

augmentcode bot commented Jan 2, 2026

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Bumps the pinned Rust toolchain from nightly-2025-12-22 to nightly-2025-12-29.

Changes: Refreshes the error-stack documentation badges to reflect the new nightly date.

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Copy link

@augmentcode augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 86 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 59.02%. Comparing base (0e233cf) to head (d0e58c4).
⚠️ Report is 50 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/principal.rs 0.00% 15 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/data_type.rs 0.00% 13 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity_type.rs 0.00% 13 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/property_type.rs 0.00% 12 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity.rs 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/status.rs 0.00% 9 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/permissions.rs 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
.../@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity_query_request.rs 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/json.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/mod.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8235      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.02%   59.02%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1187     1187              
  Lines      112486   112493       +7     
  Branches     4939     4939              
==========================================
  Hits        66394    66394              
- Misses      45334    45341       +7     
  Partials      758      758              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.88% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot changed the title Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2025-12-29 Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2026-01-05 Jan 5, 2026
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/rs/rust-toolchains branch from 201e839 to b5f1fae Compare January 5, 2026 08:18
@hash-worker hash-worker bot changed the title Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2026-01-05 Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2026-01-12 Jan 12, 2026
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/rs/rust-toolchains branch from b5f1fae to fd38293 Compare January 12, 2026 10:50
@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann removed their assignment Jan 17, 2026
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut January 17, 2026 18:45 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot added the type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team label Jan 17, 2026
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 17, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

2 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
ds-theme Ignored Ignored Jan 17, 2026 6:45pm
hashdotdesign Ignored Ignored Jan 17, 2026 6:45pm

Copy link
Member

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 17, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 17 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run1


Comparing deps/rs/rust-toolchains (d0e58c4) with main (2a2257a)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them.

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor Author

hash-worker bot commented Jan 17, 2026

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$26.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.126 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.077 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$23.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.888 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-63.428 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.066 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.561 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.369 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$3.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.998 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$3.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}16.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$39.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$76.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 456 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.759 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$44.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 235 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$46.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$54.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 458 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$41.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$420 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.33 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.378 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$94.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 470 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.616 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$85.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 472 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.097 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$281 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.18 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$18.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.834 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$22.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.983 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.876 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.999 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 258 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.044 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.884 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.208 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.977 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$46.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.760 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$97.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 469 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$52.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.009 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$62.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$71.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 411 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$81.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 428 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$50.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.311 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$77.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 408 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$56.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 348 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$63.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 339 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$66.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 387 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.224 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$67.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 613 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 473 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$39.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-16.860 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$550 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.34 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

@hash-worker hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 21, 2026
@graphite-app graphite-app bot requested review from a team January 21, 2026 19:16
Merged via the queue into main with commit 7af3808 Jan 21, 2026
311 of 315 checks passed
@hash-worker hash-worker bot deleted the deps/rs/rust-toolchains branch January 21, 2026 19:38
TimDiekmann added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) area/libs > error-stack Affects the `error-stack` crate (library) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants