Skip to content

[MAINTENANCE] Only run python 3.13 marker tests on PRs#11666

Merged
tyler-hoffman merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
m/reduce-python-versions-run-on-prs
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

[MAINTENANCE] Only run python 3.13 marker tests on PRs#11666
tyler-hoffman merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
m/reduce-python-versions-run-on-prs

Conversation

@tyler-hoffman
Copy link
Contributor

@tyler-hoffman tyler-hoffman commented Feb 13, 2026

Motivation

For externally-hosted datasources, e.g. snowflake and databricks, the number of entities we create impacts the runtime. We've taken previous measures to automate cleanup of these periodically. This is an additional step to improve performance.

Running tests against multiple python versions helps catch a few categories of bugs:

  • differences in python standard library across versions
  • differences in versions of dependencies we pull in

But the main point of our marker tests is to verify differences between datasources (not the libraries that connect to them), and running multiple versions of python against the same datasource (e.g. instance of snowflake) is not uncovering these types of errors.

So we'll try to cut the number of tests running on every PR, and leave the full version matrix to run for releases, as it does today.

  • Description of PR changes above includes a link to an existing GitHub issue
  • PR title is prefixed with one of: [BUGFIX], [FEATURE], [DOCS], [MAINTENANCE], [CONTRIB], [MINORBUMP]
  • Code is linted - run invoke lint (uses ruff format + ruff check)
  • Appropriate tests and docs have been updated

For more information about contributing, visit our community resources.

After you submit your PR, keep the page open and monitor the statuses of the various checks made by our continuous integration process at the bottom of the page. Please fix any issues that come up and reach out on Slack if you need help. Thanks for contributing!

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Deploy Preview for niobium-lead-7998 canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1ec0bdf
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/niobium-lead-7998/deploys/698f93a5c79ad00008ee659c

@tyler-hoffman tyler-hoffman changed the title Only run python 3.13 marker tests on PRs [MAINTENANCE] Only run python 3.13 marker tests on PRs Feb 13, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.25%. Comparing base (1b24781) to head (1ec0bdf).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on develop.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #11666   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    84.25%   84.25%           
========================================
  Files          472      472           
  Lines        39702    39702           
========================================
  Hits         33450    33450           
  Misses        6252     6252           
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 72.74% <ø> (ø)
3.10 athena 41.53% <ø> (ø)
3.10 aws_deps 45.87% <ø> (ø)
3.10 big 55.17% <ø> (ø)
3.10 bigquery 50.69% <ø> (ø)
3.10 clickhouse 41.54% <ø> (ø)
3.10 databricks 52.45% <ø> (ø)
3.10 filesystem 63.94% <ø> (ø)
3.10 gx-redshift 50.70% <ø> (ø)
3.10 mssql 52.42% <ø> (ø)
3.10 mysql 51.11% <ø> (ø)
3.10 openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 59.24% <ø> (ø)
3.10 postgresql 54.76% <ø> (ø)
3.10 snowflake 53.27% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
3.10 spark 55.33% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
3.10 spark_connect 46.37% <ø> (ø)
3.10 trino 48.20% <ø> (ø)
3.11 72.74% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
3.11 athena ?
3.11 aws_deps ?
3.11 big ?
3.11 clickhouse ?
3.11 mysql ?
3.11 openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.11 spark_connect ?
3.12 72.74% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
3.12 athena ?
3.12 aws_deps ?
3.12 big ?
3.12 filesystem ?
3.12 mssql ?
3.12 mysql ?
3.12 openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.12 spark_connect ?
3.13 72.75% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
3.13 athena 41.53% <ø> (ø)
3.13 aws_deps 45.87% <ø> (ø)
3.13 big 55.17% <ø> (ø)
3.13 bigquery 50.69% <ø> (ø)
3.13 clickhouse 41.54% <ø> (ø)
3.13 databricks 52.46% <ø> (ø)
3.13 filesystem 63.94% <ø> (ø)
3.13 gx-redshift 50.71% <ø> (ø)
3.13 mssql 52.42% <ø> (ø)
3.13 mysql 51.11% <ø> (ø)
3.13 openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 59.24% <ø> (ø)
3.13 postgresql 54.76% <ø> (ø)
3.13 snowflake 53.27% <ø> (ø)
3.13 spark 55.33% <ø> (ø)
3.13 spark_connect 46.38% <ø> (ø)
3.13 trino 48.20% <ø> (ø)
cloud 0.00% <ø> (ø)
docs-basic 58.52% <ø> (ø)
docs-creds-needed 57.50% <ø> (ø)
docs-spark 56.63% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@tyler-hoffman tyler-hoffman added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 17, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Feb 17, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@billdirks billdirks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@tyler-hoffman tyler-hoffman added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 18, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Feb 18, 2026
@tyler-hoffman tyler-hoffman added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 18, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Feb 18, 2026
@tyler-hoffman tyler-hoffman added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 19, 2026
Merged via the queue into develop with commit a7d653d Feb 19, 2026
71 of 72 checks passed
@tyler-hoffman tyler-hoffman deleted the m/reduce-python-versions-run-on-prs branch February 19, 2026 17:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants