fix: protect against NPE in CollectionInfoBuilder#129
Open
pmauduit wants to merge 1 commit intogeonetwork:mainfrom
Open
fix: protect against NPE in CollectionInfoBuilder#129pmauduit wants to merge 1 commit intogeonetwork:mainfrom
pmauduit wants to merge 1 commit intogeonetwork:mainfrom
Conversation
In case of missing translations on virtual CSW, there is a risk to raise a NullPointerException. Preventing this by using an empty string.
|
Contributor
Author
|
@juanluisrp / @fxprunayre / @davidblasby sorry to ping you as you were the last ones contributing on the repository here, any objection to merge this one ? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In case of missing translations on virtual CSW, there is a risk to raise a
NullPointerExceptionbecauselabelwill benull. Preventing this by using an empty string instead.Tests:
./mvnw clean testis fine,verifyis not because of #128