-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
doc: Added new repos to Arbitrum ecosystem. #2479
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: Added new repos to Arbitrum ecosystem. #2479
Conversation
7e3b5f3 to
ba9f704
Compare
|
Rebased with the latest changes |
|
Thank you for your contribution! After reviewing the ecosystem connections in this PR, we have some items that need to be addressed: 1. Uncertain EcosystemsCan you help me understand why 2. Multichain EcosystemsThe following ecosystems are multichain protocols that deploy across 10+ chains. Per our taxonomy guidelines, we do not connect individual L1/L2 chains directly to broad multichain ecosystems. Instead, specific Arbitrum-relevant repos from these projects can be added via
|
Repo-Level ReviewWe've analyzed the 395 repositories in this PR for meaningful Arbitrum involvement. Here are the results:
Repos to Remove (84)The following repos were analyzed and found to have no meaningful Arbitrum-specific involvement (e.g., no Arbitrum network configs, no Arbitrum contract deployments, no Arbitrum-specific code). I noticed that many of these repos are the core repos of multichain ecosystems, I think these repos should also fall under the same categorization for multichain ecosystems, where their actual intent is more multichain aligned rather than specifically Arbitrum aligned. Click to expand full list |
|
Happy to discuss any specific ecosystem or repos if you disagree with any of these reviews. Thanks again! |
41b74d3 to
4a75fa8
Compare
4a75fa8 to
43d0316
Compare
|
Thank you for the detailed comment. Changes are applied as you suggested. Thanks. |
|
Sorry for the late review and thanks for making the updates from the earlier review. I review the PR in its latest state, and found: Not Meaningful Crypto Repositories (Should be Removed)These repositories don't contain meaningful crypto code - they are documentation sites, asset repositories, or educational content. It makes sense that these repos are directly connected to their respective project ecosystems, but they don't belong to the Arbitrum ecosystem taxonomy.
Too Broad for Arbitrum - Should be EVM or Multi-chainThese repositories support 10+ chains and should not be listed under a single ecosystem. They belong in
Happy to discuss any specific repositories if you believe they have Arbitrum-specific functionality that warrants inclusion. Separately, on the ecosystem -> ecosystem connections. Can you help me understand why DackieSwap (seems EVM/multichain) and Notifi Network should be connected to Arbitrum? |
|
Hello @yizhao-ec, I just updated the list with the latest instructions. |
This PR adds some Arbitrum ecosystem projects