WIP: bump moby/client and moby/api

[thaJeztah]

- What I did

- How I did it

- How to verify it

- Human readable description for the release notes

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[thaJeztah]

Some failures may be legit; need to check if the tests were wrong (and something fixed) or if we have a regression

cc @vvoland FYI

#18 68.04 === FAIL: cli/compose/loader TestLoadWithInterpolationCastFull (0.01s)
#18 68.04     loader_test.go:761: assertion failed: 
#18 68.04         --- expected
#18 68.04         +++ config
#18 68.04           &types.Config{
#18 68.04           	Filename: "filename.yml",
#18 68.04           	Version:  "3.8",
#18 68.04           	Services: types.Services{
#18 68.04           		{
#18 68.04           			... // 33 identical fields
#18 68.04           			Networks: nil,
#18 68.04           			Pid:      "",
#18 68.04           			Ports: []types.ServicePortConfig{
#18 68.04         - 				{Mode: "ingress", Target: 555, Protocol: "tcp"},
#18 68.04         - 				{Mode: "ingress", Target: 34567, Protocol: "tcp"},
#18 68.04           				{Target: 555, Published: 555},
#18 68.04           			},
#18 68.04           			Privileged: true,
#18 68.04           			ReadOnly:   true,
#18 68.04           			... // 17 identical fields
#18 68.04           		},
#18 68.04           	},
#18 68.04           	Networks: {"front": {Name: "front", External: {External: true}, Internal: true, Attachable: true, ...}},
#18 68.04           	Volumes:  {"data": {Name: "data", External: {External: true}}},
#18 68.04           	... // 3 identical fields
#18 68.04           }
#18 68.04         

[thaJeztah]

Still some remaining failures; need to look at these; from what I can see, it's to allow a port-mapping without host-port specified (--port 80) and to implicitly use that as --port 0:80 ?

#18 68.06 === Failed
#18 68.06 === FAIL: cli/command/service TestUpdatePorts (0.00s)
#18 68.06     update_test.go:282: assertion failed: expected [{ udp %!s(uint32=333) %!s(uint32=0) } {  %!s(uint32=555) %!s(uint32=0) } { tcp %!s(uint32=1000) %!s(uint32=1000) ingress}] (length 3) to have length 2
#18 68.06
#18 68.06 === FAIL: cli/command/service TestUpdatePortsRmWithProtocol (0.00s)
#18 68.06     update_test.go:499: assertion failed: expected [{ tcp %!s(uint32=80) %!s(uint32=8080) ingress} { tcp %!s(uint32=81) %!s(uint32=8081) ingress} { tcp %!s(uint32=82) %!s(uint32=8082) ingress}] (length 3) to have length 2
#18 68.06
#18 68.06 === FAIL: cli/compose/loader TestFullExample (0.02s)
#18 68.06     loader_test.go:982: assertion failed: error is not nil: decoding failed due to the following error(s):
#18 68.06
#18 68.06         'Ports' invalid ranges specified for container and host Ports: 3001-3005 and 0
#18 68.06
#18 68.06 === FAIL: opts/swarmopts TestPortOptValidSimpleSyntax/80 (0.00s)
#18 68.06     port_test.go:147: assertion failed: expected [] (length 0) to have length 1
#18 68.06     port_test.go:149: expected [] to contain { tcp 80 0 ingress}, did not
#18 68.06
68.06 === FAIL: opts/swarmopts TestPortOptValidSimpleSyntax/80 (0.00s)
68.06     port_test.go:147: assertion failed: expected [] (length 0) to have length 1
68.06     port_test.go:149: expected [] to contain { tcp 80 0 ingress}, did not
68.06 
68.06 === FAIL: opts/swarmopts TestPortOptValidSimpleSyntax (0.00s

[thaJeztah]

This is the culprit; the zero value means "map to ephemeral port" so should not be discarded