Remove shaded deps

[mcruzdev]

Description

I am not sure if this one is the best way to solve some issues related to native compilation. For Spring Native and Quarkus the grpc-netty-shaded is not recommended due to recents CVEs and a lot of GraalVM configurations and substitutions.

We strongly recommend NOT using a shaded Netty - the recent cves should tell you why

Not to mention that it increase drammatically the memory usage too: the most of the assumption from Netty related pooling is to be the only one (like last Highlander...)
if you shade it...it end up pretty bad.

I am not an expertise in the netty subject, I appreciate any suggestions and comments about this change.

Issue reference

We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.

Please reference the issue this PR will close: #[issue number]

Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list:

• Code compiles correctly
• Created/updated tests
• Extended the documentation

[salaboy]

@mcruzdev so this change in Quarkus works?

[salaboy]

@javier-aliaga @dapr/maintainers-java-sdk Can we approve and merge this, as this is blocking the quarkus integration.
Any objections?

[salaboy]

LGMT

[javier-aliaga]

So this is not a problem with CVEs but for native compilation, isnt it? I do not this PR introduces a lot of changes, so I am ok to merge it and give it a try.

[salaboy]

@javier-aliaga This is for native compilation... let's merge it and see... if this cause any issues, we are not catching them with the pipelines.. so it is a good test.
But even with this, I don't think that spring native compilation will work.

[salaboy]

@siri-varma can you please approve this?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.49%. Comparing base (d759c53) to head (58e4c7e).
⚠️ Report is 226 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1543      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     76.91%   78.49%   +1.58%     
- Complexity     1592     1913     +321     
============================================
  Files           145      215      +70     
  Lines          4843     5827     +984     
  Branches        562      649      +87     
============================================
+ Hits           3725     4574     +849     
- Misses          821      916      +95     
- Partials        297      337      +40     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.