⚡️ Speed up method JavaAssertTransformer._find_fluent_chain_end by 33% in PR #1295 (feat/java-remove-asserts-transformer)#1331
Conversation
This optimization achieves a **32% runtime improvement** (from 1.92ms to 1.45ms) by reducing redundant computations in two performance-critical string parsing methods that process Java assertion chains. ## Key Optimizations ### 1. **Local Variable Caching in `_find_fluent_chain_end`** The original code called `len(source)` repeatedly in every loop iteration—up to 7 times per iteration across multiple while loops. The optimized version calculates this once upfront (`n = len(s)`) and reuses short variable names (`s`, `ws`) to minimize attribute lookups. This is particularly impactful in the method name scanning loop which executes ~7,157 times according to the profiler, where the line went from 10.3% of total time to 9.3%. ### 2. **Hoisting `prev_char` Computation in `_find_balanced_parens`** The original implementation recalculated `prev_char = code[pos - 1] if pos > 0 else ""` on **every character** (4,663 hits), accounting for 12.3% of execution time. The optimized version: - Initializes `prev_char` once before the loop - Updates it only at the end of each iteration with `prev_char = char` - Eliminates the conditional check on every character This change reduced the per-character overhead from 351.5ns to just updating a simple variable assignment, nearly eliminating this hotspot. ### 3. **Pre-computing String Length** Both methods now compute length once (`n = len(code)`, `n = len(s)`) rather than repeatedly calling `len()` in tight loop conditions. Given the high iteration counts (787 iterations in `_find_fluent_chain_end`, 5,389 in `_find_balanced_parens`), this compounds into measurable savings. ## Performance Impact by Test Type The optimization shows varying benefits based on workload characteristics: - **Large-scale chains** (300+ method calls): **30-50% faster** - The benefit scales with chain length due to cumulative savings from reduced per-iteration overhead - **Complex nested structures**: **32-49% faster** - Deep nesting means more iterations in `_find_balanced_parens`, where the `prev_char` optimization is most effective - **Short chains**: **3-12% faster** - Even simple cases benefit, though less dramatically - **String-heavy arguments**: **18-44% faster** - The character-by-character processing in `_find_balanced_parens` benefits significantly from the `prev_char` optimization The profiler data confirms these are the right hotspots: the `_find_balanced_parens` call consumed 73.2% of total time in the original, and the optimizations directly target the most-executed lines within these methods. All correctness tests pass, confirming functional equivalence while delivering substantial runtime improvements.
|
@claude fix the pre-commit issues and push |
|
Claude finished @KRRT7's task in 1m 57s —— View job Pre-commit Analysis Complete ✅Todo List:
FindingsI've analyzed the pre-commit CI failure and found that the The pre-commit failures are from pre-existing issues in OTHER files (not touched by this PR):
These are linting issues that exist in the base branch ( ConclusionNo changes needed for this PR. The optimized code in The optimization changes in this PR are:
--- | |
|
Closing stale bot PR. |
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #1295
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
feat/java-remove-asserts-transformer.📄 33% (0.33x) speedup for
JavaAssertTransformer._find_fluent_chain_endincodeflash/languages/java/remove_asserts.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.92 milliseconds→1.45 milliseconds(best of141runs)📝 Explanation and details
This optimization achieves a 32% runtime improvement (from 1.92ms to 1.45ms) by reducing redundant computations in two performance-critical string parsing methods that process Java assertion chains.
Key Optimizations
1. Local Variable Caching in
_find_fluent_chain_endThe original code called
len(source)repeatedly in every loop iteration—up to 7 times per iteration across multiple while loops. The optimized version calculates this once upfront (n = len(s)) and reuses short variable names (s,ws) to minimize attribute lookups. This is particularly impactful in the method name scanning loop which executes ~7,157 times according to the profiler, where the line went from 10.3% of total time to 9.3%.2. Hoisting
prev_charComputation in_find_balanced_parensThe original implementation recalculated
prev_char = code[pos - 1] if pos > 0 else ""on every character (4,663 hits), accounting for 12.3% of execution time. The optimized version:prev_charonce before the loopprev_char = charThis change reduced the per-character overhead from 351.5ns to just updating a simple variable assignment, nearly eliminating this hotspot.
3. Pre-computing String Length
Both methods now compute length once (
n = len(code),n = len(s)) rather than repeatedly callinglen()in tight loop conditions. Given the high iteration counts (787 iterations in_find_fluent_chain_end, 5,389 in_find_balanced_parens), this compounds into measurable savings.Performance Impact by Test Type
The optimization shows varying benefits based on workload characteristics:
_find_balanced_parens, where theprev_charoptimization is most effective_find_balanced_parensbenefits significantly from theprev_charoptimizationThe profiler data confirms these are the right hotspots: the
_find_balanced_parenscall consumed 73.2% of total time in the original, and the optimizations directly target the most-executed lines within these methods. All correctness tests pass, confirming functional equivalence while delivering substantial runtime improvements.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr1295-2026-02-03T22.00.31and push.