You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Gathering thermal comfort related data (or in general user-generated data)
is costly and takes time.
Hard to generalize over a big population of people, as well as obtain a similar
number of responses for each label/category (e.g. Thermal comfort labels, always
a predominance in the 'comfort' class and not the rest)
Methods
Try different generative models for augment datasets
GAN (and its variations: CGAN, WGAN, WCGAN, TGAN, TableGAN)
Autoencoders (and the variations: Adversarial, variational)
Evaluation metrics
Baseline: Original train and test set
Train set and synthetic data as training set: Should increase the performance since classes would be more balanced
Synthetic data as training set: Performance should be comparable with the baseline showing the synthetic set captures the same characteristics as the real train set
About
Human comfort datasets are widely used for multiple scenarios in smart buildings. From thermal comfort prediction to personalized indoor environments, labelled subjective responses from participants in a experiment are required to feed different machine learning models. However, many of these dataset are small in samples per participants, number o…