Skip to content

chore: update CODEOWNERS for deprecated servers#2734

Open
MichaelWalker-git wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/update-codeowners
Open

chore: update CODEOWNERS for deprecated servers#2734
MichaelWalker-git wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/update-codeowners

Conversation

@MichaelWalker-git
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Deprecated servers updated

Server Replacement
aws-bedrock-data-automation boto3 API or aws-api-mcp-server
aws-diagram diagram agent skill
cdk aws-iac-mcp-server
cfn aws-iac-mcp-server
code-doc-gen
core individual MCP servers directly
cost-explorer billing-cost-management-mcp-server
frontend Kiro specs or project-level docs
git-repo-research Context7
nova-canvas bedrock-image-mcp-server
syntheticdata AI assistants natively
terraform HashiCorp's official terraform-mcp-server

Test plan

  • Verify CODEOWNERS syntax is valid (no CI failures)
  • Confirm deprecated servers only require admins approval
  • Confirm active servers retain their original team owners

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of the project license.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 19, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.29%. Comparing base (6fda1e9) to head (a1c17d7).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2734      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.29%   91.29%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1001     1001              
  Lines       73725    73725              
  Branches    11880    11880              
==========================================
- Hits        67305    67304       -1     
  Misses       3966     3966              
- Partials     2454     2455       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates repository ownership rules to reduce review noise for deprecated MCP servers and remove an obsolete entry for a deleted server directory.

Changes:

  • Remove the CODEOWNERS entry for cloudwatch-appsignals-mcp-server (directory no longer present).
  • Add # DEPRECATED annotations (with replacement guidance where applicable) for 12 deprecated servers.
  • Simplify ownership of deprecated server directories to @awslabs/mcp-admins only.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@MichaelWalker-git MichaelWalker-git force-pushed the chore/update-codeowners branch from f8b9d0b to a372273 Compare March 19, 2026 21:36
Copy link
Member

@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust requested review from a team March 20, 2026 00:20
- Remove cloudwatch-appsignals-mcp-server (deleted from main)
- Mark 12 deprecated servers with DEPRECATED comments and replacement pointers
- Simplify deprecated server ownership to @awslabs/mcp-admins only
  (external team owners no longer need review requests for deprecated code)
- Add missing owners from partner team tracker:
  @Songry26 to aws-msk-mcp-server
  @shsrams to billing-cost-management-mcp-server
  @saidrhs to aws-bedrock-custom-model-import-mcp-server
Copy link
Member

@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: To triage

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants