Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Feb 1, 2026

The Chinese quick-start.md contained outdated concepts (text-schema, JSON schema, NarrativeTextVis) that diverged from the English version's focus on T8's declarative syntax.

Changes

  • Info-box section: Replaced text-schema/JSON explanation with declarative syntax messaging

    • Reframed from "why not use text-schema" to "why use T8's declarative syntax"
    • Updated advantages list to emphasize LLM-friendliness, declarative nature, and framework agnosticism
    • Applied proper Chinese punctuation (full-width dashes)
  • Features section: Updated terminology from text-schema to T8 语法

    • Changed "解析文本结构描述 json schema 为 html" to "将 T8 语法结构解析为语义化的 HTML 元素"
    • Clarified rendering engine description to match English version

Before vs After

Before:

**_`text-schema` 构建成本高不如直接拼接 DOM 快,我为什么还要用 T8?_**

要解答这个问题需要先明确 `JSON` 从哪儿来?
narrative 相关技术基于 `JSON` 数据来自 LLM 大模型生成的假设...

After:

**_"为什么我应该使用 T8 而不是直接拼接 DOM?"_**

答案在于 T8 的**声明式语法** —— 这是其与众不同的核心特性。
T8 语法是一种轻量级的、基于 Markdown 的 DSL(领域特定语言)...

All other Chinese-English documentation pairs in site/ verified to be structurally consistent.

Original prompt

https://github.com/antvis/T8/blob/main/site/zh/tutorial/quick-start.md 的内容和 英文内容不匹配,按照英文内容重新组织一下。并检查一下 site 目录的其他中英文是否一致的。


💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

@hustcc hustcc marked this pull request as ready for review February 1, 2026 11:59
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Update Chinese quick start tutorial for consistency with English Sync Chinese quick-start documentation with English version Feb 1, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from hustcc February 1, 2026 12:02
@hustcc hustcc merged commit 5edee7f into main Feb 1, 2026
1 check passed
@hustcc hustcc deleted the copilot/update-zh-tutorial-for-consistency branch February 1, 2026 12:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants