Housekeeping

[PJUllrich]

• Bumps tool-versions to latest Elixir/Erlang/Rust
• Bumps all dependencies to latest
• Fixes warnings in tests
• Bumps version and updates Changelog

Closes:

• Update README.md #27
• Request for 0.13.0 release with MJML 5.0 support #30 (once released on Hex)
• MJML 5.0 release? #29 (once released on Hex)
• newer style EEx comments not working #26

[akoutmos]

Awesome work!

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build eab4cfcde17d5defe6c33e3333ce60c27d46d6a7-PR-31

Details

• 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.03%) to 96.875%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 3d879f4b4f3446c21b3d7ffe222ac5daf7f7d5ad:	0.03%
Covered Lines:	124
Relevant Lines:	128

---

💛 - Coveralls

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8ca6cb1ceb4417572d192ea63e00ed7871662935-PR-31

Details

• 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.03%) to 96.875%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 3d879f4b4f3446c21b3d7ffe222ac5daf7f7d5ad:	0.03%
Covered Lines:	124
Relevant Lines:	128

---

💛 - Coveralls

[PJUllrich]

@akoutmos I dropped support for Erlang 26 in the CI because erlexec updated their docs in this commit to the Erlang 27 format which now includes moduledoc based on this proposal (EEP-59) by José Valim. That means that erlexec only supports OTP 27+ which means that mjml_eex now only supports OTP 27+ unless we drop the erlexec dependency back to 2.0.8 which is two versions down by now (latest being 2.2.2). What do you think?

Edit: Theoretically though, since the erlexec dependency is optional: true, a user of this library could always add erlexec: 2.0.8 manually and support OTP 26 again. So 🤷