Open
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Apache Jena will require Java 21 at Jena version 6.0.0 (last two LTS). |
Contributor
Author
|
Added a commit for upgrade to Apache Jena 6.0.0.
|
Contributor
|
@ashleycaselli, @HolgerKnublauch - any chance of this getting processed? |
Collaborator
Yes, I'm on it! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Includes #192
This PR addresses some warnings where Jena is signalling rename/removal of operations.
The remaining warnings relate to use of the
OntModel.They relate to the switch to a new artifact jena-ontapi.
If the only requirement is for owl:imports processing, the source code to handle owl:imports could taken from Jena to remove the linkage.