Conversation
These will be used prepare a hierarchical tag overview. Issue: TNG#54 Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Issue: TNG#54 Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Issue: TNG#54 Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Issue: TNG#54 Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Issue: TNG#54 Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Issue: TNG#54 Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Issue: TNG#54 Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Issue: TNG#54 Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]> # Conflicts: # jgiven-core/src/main/java/com/tngtech/jgiven/report/asciidoc/AsciiDocReportGenerator.java
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
|
Moinmoin! Many thanks -- in the meantime, I had already opened #1940 to extract the generator into a module of its own... let me check how we can combine the two. |
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]> # Conflicts: # jgiven-asciidoc-report/src/main/java/com/tngtech/jgiven/report/asciidoc/AsciiDocReportGenerator.java # jgiven-asciidoc-report/src/main/java/com/tngtech/jgiven/report/asciidoc/HierarchyCalculator.java # jgiven-asciidoc-report/src/test/java/com/tngtech/jgiven/report/asciidoc/AsciiDocIntroSnippetGeneratorTest.java
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Also reformat Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
Also optimize some tag prefixes to improve the understanding. Issue: TNG#54 Signed-off-by: Johannes Thorn <[email protected]>
johthor
force-pushed
the
feature/54-asciiDocReporter-tags
branch
from
fcf4be9 to
1866f6a
Compare
|
Hey @hvennekate, I had tried to rebase these commits onto #1940 but it got to confusing for me to finish it. Now after the extraction has been merged I have merged the current I believe that everything is now working as expected. At a later date I might still add the tag hierarchy tree as it is shown in the HTML report. |
| import org.junit.runner.RunWith; | ||
| import org.junit.runners.Parameterized; | ||
|
|
||
| @RunWith(Parameterized.class) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we have JUnit5 tests?
l-1squared
left a comment
l-1squared
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Output looks fine
but for some reason the report says "There are 999 tagged scenarios" when no test was executed
| } | ||
|
|
||
| static String toAsciiDocTagStart(ExecutionStatus executionStatus) { | ||
| public static String toAsciiDocStartTag(final String scenarioName) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks eerily similar to what the TagMapper does. is that intended?
| this.allTags = allTags; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| Map<String, Map<String, List<String>>> computeGroupedTag() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we potentially return something that is easier to decypher?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
also isn't the groupoing files by their Tag (but then why the double map?)
so would groupScenarioFilesByTag not be a better name?
| tagNames.add(mkTag("Best Tag")); | ||
| final long nineMilliseconds = 10_000_000L; | ||
| List<Tag> tags = List.of(mkTag("BestTag")); | ||
| long nineMilliseconds = 10_000_000L; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why does nine millis start with 10?
| @Test | ||
| public void convert_scenario_footer_with_multiple_tags() { | ||
| // given | ||
| List<Tag> tags = List.of(mkTag("BestTag"), mkTag("OtherTag"), mkTag("NicestTag")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"OtherTag" must be really intimidated by it fabulous company :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shouldn't this, of all things, have some tests?
3 participants
Create index files for all used JGiven tags.
These pages distinguish between single-valued and multi-valued tags.