Update Server.c #10
Open
Update Server.c #10
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
解决提示在配置SecureNAT明细路由时地，提示“开源版本不提供支持”，导入不能下发明细路由的问题。 注释10915-10918行
miroslavhruz
pushed a commit
to simplewayglobal/SoftEtherVPN_Stable
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2025
=================================================================
==1505093==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x607000366b88 at pc 0x7f72afadc34a bp 0x7f72990fa390 sp 0x7f72990fa388
READ of size 4 at 0x607000366b88 thread T22
#0 0x7f72afadc349 in GetCaps /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:1861
SoftEtherVPN#1 0x7f72afadc382 in GetCapsInt /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:1802
SoftEtherVPN#2 0x7f72afaf72a5 in GetServerCapsInt /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:1098
SoftEtherVPN#3 0x7f72afaf7318 in GetServerCapsBool /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:1104
SoftEtherVPN#4 0x7f72afaf771e in SiWriteHubCfg /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:4887
SoftEtherVPN#5 0x7f72afaf771e in SiWriteHubCfg /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:4824
SoftEtherVPN#6 0x7f72afaf7c0b in SiWriteHubs /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:5548
SoftEtherVPN#7 0x7f72afaf7c0b in SiWriteHubs /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:5515
SoftEtherVPN#8 0x7f72afaf81d6 in SiWriteConfigurationToCfg /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:3166
SoftEtherVPN#9 0x7f72afaf86bc in SiWriteConfigurationFile /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:6593
SoftEtherVPN#10 0x7f72afaf86bc in SiWriteConfigurationFile /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:6569
#11 0x7f72afaf8914 in SiSaverThread /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:6561
SoftEtherVPN#12 0x7f72afaf8914 in SiSaverThread /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:6547
SoftEtherVPN#13 0x7f72af6e0cfa in ThreadPoolProc /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Mayaqua/Kernel.c:872
SoftEtherVPN#14 0x7f72af6e0cfa in ThreadPoolProc /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Mayaqua/Kernel.c:827
SoftEtherVPN#15 0x7f72af76eeb4 in UnixDefaultThreadProc /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Mayaqua/Unix.c:1604
SoftEtherVPN#16 0x7f72af4ffc56 in start_thread (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x8cc56) (BuildId: 6107835fa7d4725691b2b7f6aaee7abe09f493b2)
SoftEtherVPN#17 0x7f72af585a6f in __clone3 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x112a6f) (BuildId: 6107835fa7d4725691b2b7f6aaee7abe09f493b2)
0x607000366b88 is located 24 bytes inside of 72-byte region [0x607000366b70,0x607000366bb8)
freed by thread T0 here:
#0 0x7f72afed7fc8 in __interceptor_free.part.0 (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xd7fc8) (BuildId: 9501248886f79bf1482f3e153f794be742818172)
SoftEtherVPN#1 0x7f72af76ed6f in UnixMemoryFree /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Mayaqua/Unix.c:2072
previously allocated by thread T22 here:
#0 0x7f72afed92ff in malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xd92ff) (BuildId: 9501248886f79bf1482f3e153f794be742818172)
SoftEtherVPN#1 0x7f72af76f35d in UnixMemoryAlloc /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Mayaqua/Unix.c:2053
Thread T22 created by T0 here:
#0 0x7f72afe48966 in pthread_create (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0x48966) (BuildId: 9501248886f79bf1482f3e153f794be742818172)
SoftEtherVPN#1 0x7f72af76f713 in UnixInitThread /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Mayaqua/Unix.c:1683
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free /home/ilia/SoftEtherVPN/src/Cedar/Server.c:1861 in GetCaps
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
0x607000366900: 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x607000366980: 00 fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa
0x607000366a00: fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa
0x607000366a80: fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa
0x607000366b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fd fd
=>0x607000366b80: fd[fd]fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd
0x607000366c00: fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd
0x607000366c80: fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
0x607000366d00: fd fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
0x607000366d80: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
0x607000366e00: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
Addressable: 00
Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
Heap left redzone: fa
Freed heap region: fd
Stack left redzone: f1
Stack mid redzone: f2
Stack right redzone: f3
Stack after return: f5
Stack use after scope: f8
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
解决提示在配置SecureNAT明细路由时，提示“开源版本不提供支持”，导致不能下发明细路由的问题。
注释10915-10918行
Solve the problem that when configuring SecureNAT detailed routing, it prompts that "the open source version does not provide support", resulting in the problem that detailed routing cannot be invented.
Note 10915-10918 lines
Changes proposed in this pull request:
Your great patch is much appreciated. We are considering to apply your patch into the SoftEther VPN main tree.
SoftEther VPN Patch Acceptance Policy:
http://www.softether.org/5-download/src/9.patch
You have two options which are described on the above policy.
Could you please choose either option 1 or 2, and specify it clearly on the reply?