Skip to content

Conversation

@patricebechard
Copy link
Collaborator

@patricebechard patricebechard commented Aug 25, 2025

This PR introduces a set of new classes to enable async use of PySNC.

TODO:

  • increase test coverage
  • add docs

@patricebechard patricebechard self-assigned this Aug 25, 2025
@patricebechard patricebechard marked this pull request as ready for review August 25, 2025 19:39
@patricebechard patricebechard requested a review from vetsin August 25, 2025 19:39
@patricebechard patricebechard marked this pull request as draft August 29, 2025 16:35
@vetsin
Copy link
Collaborator

vetsin commented Sep 8, 2025

I'm pretty happy with this, will approve when marked ready.

The only other consideration i had would be making this an optional feature so we don't pollute the basic dependencies for people who don't need async? Though I haven't ever tried this and not sure what the cost:benefit ratio is here

@patricebechard patricebechard marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2025 19:17
Copy link
Collaborator

@vetsin vetsin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome! thank you for doing this

@patricebechard patricebechard merged commit 50cc1c0 into main Sep 8, 2025
3 checks passed
@patricebechard patricebechard deleted the scratch/async_support branch September 8, 2025 19:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants