Skip to content

Section 2.4.2: Update INFOSTEP and INFOITER#686

Merged
blattms merged 6 commits intoOPM:mainfrom
gdfldm:infostep-infoiter
Dec 11, 2025
Merged

Section 2.4.2: Update INFOSTEP and INFOITER#686
blattms merged 6 commits intoOPM:mainfrom
gdfldm:infostep-infoiter

Conversation

@gdfldm
Copy link
Collaborator

@gdfldm gdfldm commented Dec 8, 2025

Closes #677

Copy link
Member

@blattms blattms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot.

I think we need to describe what a local solver is. I guess this is the solver within NLDD and hence when not using NLDD it is zero? @atgeirr please propose something

In Figure 36 one cannot anything anymore, because the font is so small. Can we dosomething about this? Maybe include the picture in landscape mode?

@@ -94802,3139 +94802,7681 @@ Updated with AFR/TSA Rev-D comments and new keywords.</dc:description><meta:init
<text:p text:style-name="P422"/>
<text:p text:style-name="P429"/>
<text:p text:style-name="P560">In addition to the aforementioned <text:a xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="#__RefHeading___Toc304796_3851943165" text:style-name="Internet_20_link" text:visited-style-name="Visited_20_Internet_20_Link">PERFORMA</text:a> keyword in the <text:a xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="#__RefHeading___Toc43949_784232322" text:style-name="Internet_20_link" text:visited-style-name="Visited_20_Internet_20_Link">SUMMARY</text:a> section, which is available for both OPM Flow and the commercial simulator, <text:s/>OPM Flow has two additional numerical performance reports that may help in identifying numerical issues. <text:s/>Both of these OPM Flow specific reports tabulate the numerical performance data available in the print file, in an easily readable format.</text:p>
<text:p text:style-name="P549">The first is the INFOSTEP report illustrated in <text:sequence-ref text:reference-format="category-and-value" text:ref-name="refFigure34">Figure 2.35</text:sequence-ref>, which summarizes the numerical performance for the each time step. The Assembly, LSetup, LSolve, Update and Output header columns represent the time in seconds taken to complete the particular work item. </text:p>
<text:p text:style-name="P549">The first is the INFOSTEP report illustrated in <text:sequence-ref text:reference-format="category-and-value" text:ref-name="refFigure34">Figure 2.35</text:sequence-ref>, which summarizes the numerical performance for the each time step. The Assembly, LSetup, LSolve, LocSol, Update and Output header columns represent the time in seconds taken to complete the particular work item. </text:p>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While at it, maybe correct to:

Suggested change
<text:p text:style-name="P549">The first is the INFOSTEP report illustrated in <text:sequence-ref text:reference-format="category-and-value" text:ref-name="refFigure34">Figure 2.35</text:sequence-ref>, which summarizes the numerical performance for the each time step. The Assembly, LSetup, LSolve, LocSol, Update and Output header columns represent the time in seconds taken to complete the particular work item. </text:p>
<text:p text:style-name="P549">The first is the INFOSTEP report illustrated in <text:sequence-ref text:reference-format="category-and-value" text:ref-name="refFigure34">Figure 2.35</text:sequence-ref>, which summarizes the numerical performance for each time step. The Assembly, LSetup, LSolve, LocSol, Update and Output header columns represent the time in seconds taken to complete the particular work item. </text:p>

@gdfldm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gdfldm commented Dec 10, 2025

In Figure 36 one cannot anything anymore,

I can increase the size by about 50% by rotating the image?

I just tried this and the size of 2.fodt increased from 10 to 12 MB. The text was just about readable at 200% zoom before and 140% zoom after rotating on a 27inch monitor.

@blattms blattms merged commit f5fa58b into OPM:main Dec 11, 2025
1 check passed
@gdfldm gdfldm deleted the infostep-infoiter branch December 11, 2025 13:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

INFOITER and INFOSTEP updates

2 participants