Merged
Conversation
… of the new timestep hnode_new, not with the layerthickness from the old timestep, since T^n+1*h^n+1 = T^n*h^n + dt*SUM[Flx_adv]^n --> T^n+1 = 1/h^n+1 * [T^n*h^n + dt*SUM[Flx_adv]^n]
JanStreffing
approved these changes
Mar 3, 2026
Collaborator
|
Do you have an idea yet how large the differences may be? |
Contributor
Author
|
it should be not that large, but the stability should benefit from it! |
Contributor
Author
|
@JanStreffing : So indeed the difference with the bugfix are very small!!!
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the normalization with thickness must be done with the layerthickness of the new timestep hnode_new, not with the layerthickness from the old timestep, since
T^n+1*h^n+1 = T^n*h^n + dt*SUM[Flx_adv]^nT^n+1 = 1/h^n+1 * [T^n*h^n + dt*SUM[Flx_adv]^n]