Skip to content

chore: use custom node build#82

Draft
GuillaumeLagrange wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
custom-node-build
Draft

chore: use custom node build#82
GuillaumeLagrange wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
custom-node-build

Conversation

@GuillaumeLagrange

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will improve performance by 26.29%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 19 improved benchmarks
❌ 5 regressed benchmarks
✅ 168 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 34 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Memory fibo 30 19 B 65,624 B -99.97%
Memory wait 1ms 7 B 10 B -30%
Simulation wait 500ms 12.1 ms 17 ms -29.01%
Simulation wait 1sec 23 ms 32.3 ms -28.91%
WallTime fibo darwin 8.2 ms 11.4 ms -27.97%
Memory short body 3 25,960 B 11 B ×2,400
Memory one 45.9 KB 14.4 KB ×3.2
Memory wait 500ms 64.1 KB 23 KB ×2.8
WallTime test_iterative_fibo_100 696 ns 372 ns +87.1%
WallTime test_iterative_fibo_10 408 ns 228 ns +78.95%
WallTime switch 1 288 ns 192 ns +50%
WallTime iterative fibo 20 924 ns 648 ns +42.59%
WallTime switch 2 324 ns 228 ns +42.11%
WallTime iterative fibo 15 888 ns 636 ns +39.62%
WallTime test sync baz 10 312 ns 228 ns +36.84%
WallTime switch 2 312 ns 228 ns +36.84%
WallTime switch 1 276 ns 204 ns +35.29%
WallTime test_recursive_cached_fibo_10 1,152 ns 852 ns +35.21%
WallTime test sync baz 100 444 ns 336 ns +32.14%
Simulation wait 500ms 12.9 ms 10 ms +28.96%
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing custom-node-build (5bcdbaf) with main (bcd7e64)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 34 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Unable to generate the flame graphs

The performance report has correctly been generated, but there was an internal error while generating the flame graphs for this run. We're working on fixing the issue. Feel free to contact us on Discord or at support@codspeed.io if the issue persists.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant