Skip to content

add Zeeve in storages.csv#1285

Open
Adisaok wants to merge 57 commits intoChain-Love:mainfrom
Adisaok:patch-111100
Open

add Zeeve in storages.csv#1285
Adisaok wants to merge 57 commits intoChain-Love:mainfrom
Adisaok:patch-111100

Conversation

@Adisaok
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Adisaok Adisaok commented Apr 4, 2026

Summary

Type of change

  • Add data rows
  • Update data rows
  • Remove data rows
  • Schema change
  • Documentation/metadata only

Scope

  • Networks affected:

  • Categories affected:

  • Additional notes, additional context / screenshots:

Links

  • Related issue(s)/ DB Improvement Proposal (if schema-related):

Validation checklist

  • I followed the Style Guide and Column Definitions. I'm aware of what is !provider syntax, and that entities in /networks sub-folders inherits records from /providers folder
  • I personally opened and verified every new link I'm adding. I can confirm, that all the links I'm adding are valid.
  • If I added new entries - I personally confirmed that the provider I'm adding (modifying) currently supports the adjusted network(s). I've also verified that value in every cell I'm changing is correct according to my best understanding
  • This PR is not a blind AI-generated submission

Optional

  • Rewards address (for data patching rewards): 0xbebb8c6309b58218b62138ed88669658ebe4804a ERC20
  • Twitter (X) post link (for +10% of rewards to this PR):

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2026

Summary

Status Count
🔍 Total 1
✅ Successful 1
⏳ Timeouts 0
🔀 Redirected 0
👻 Excluded 0
❓ Unknown 0
🚫 Errors 0
⛔ Unsupported 0

Full Github Actions output

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@USS-Supervisor USS-Supervisor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review complete.

Current-cycle checks:

  • Required CI (Generate JSON and validate): success
  • Current-cycle link-check: skipped

I did not find a new blocking data-integrity issue in the current diff, but I cannot approve while the current-cycle link-check is not success.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants