Skip to content

Foundry memory v2 (procedural memory, TTL)#42832

Open
bojunehsu wants to merge 1 commit intofeature/foundry-releasefrom
paulhsu/memoryV2
Open

Foundry memory v2 (procedural memory, TTL)#42832
bojunehsu wants to merge 1 commit intofeature/foundry-releasefrom
paulhsu/memoryV2

Conversation

@bojunehsu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Data Plane API Specification Update Pull Request

Add support to enable procedural memory and memory TTL to Foundry Memory.

  • MemoryStoreDefaultOptions.procedural_memory_enabled
  • MemoryStoreDefaultOptions.chat_summary_ttl_days

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 1, 2026

Next Steps to Merge

Important checks have failed. As of today they are not blocking this PR, but in near future they may.
Addressing the following failures is highly recommended:
  • ⚠️ The check named Swagger BreakingChange has failed. To unblock this PR, follow the process at aka.ms/brch.
If you still want to proceed merging this PR without addressing the above failures, refer to step 4 in the PR workflow diagram.

Comment generated by summarize-checks workflow run.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 1, 2026

API Change Check

APIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews

Language API Review for Package
TypeSpec Azure.AI.Projects
Python azure-ai-projects
JavaScript @azure/ai-projects

Comment generated by After APIView workflow run.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added data-plane TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec labels May 1, 2026
enum:
- azure_ai_search
description: The object type, which is always 'azure_ai_search'.
name:
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IIUC this was out-of-sync with models.tsp.
Should we regenerate it first in a separated PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

data-plane TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants