Replies: 2 comments 7 replies
-
|
The first iteration would be:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
|
I wonder if there is a boilerplate that requires a manual TODO to start the dev server. Maybe it could make sense to distinguish between:
And maybe treat them differently (e.g. only showing the dev TODOs in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The following is a copy-paste of some DMs between Joel and Rom.
On peut commencer a juste les afficher au "Next steps"
A priori, les executer en sois c'est j'imagine la parti simple
Collecter les commands c'est la parti interessante (e.g. ordering)
On peut aussi demander: "Do you want me to execute these commands on your behalf?"
Idee: on pourrait faire un beau commit history
On commit apres chaque command
A la fin on dit: run
git logto see the list of commands run, andgit log -pto see the result of each commandDu coup je me dis on peut ptet bien executer les commands par defaut... on garde les "Next steps" afficher a l'utilisateurs
Idee pel mel:
Next stepsau TODO.md (on les affiche quand meme avant de les executer)TODO.md)"TODO.mdJuste des idees, par soucis d'efficacé on peut skip des idees
Par example, ptet que ca ne vaut pas le coup d'ajouter les
Next stepsauTODO.mdOu on les ajoute que si il aborte, c'est ptet plus simple (et si c'est fiable d'ecrire su le FS avant exit)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions