Skip to content

How to actually interpret needed? #434

@jgomo3

Description

@jgomo3

Given the following task dependency graph:

a -> b -> c

What happens if a and c are needed, but b isn't (based on the needed? method)?

Well, a and c will be executed.

But maybe it would have been more efficient to run only a.

So I suppose it all depends on what does actually needed? means for a Task and Rake.

I made a silly experiment where c is not executed in this case, and the test suit pass all the test, so I'm wondering if this case was overlooked or it is actually a design decision. Which in any case, a test case should be added.

Here is a simple Rakefile to test the idea:

desc 'Do A'
task a: [:b] do
  sh 'echo Do A'
end

desc 'Do B'
task b: [:c] do
  sh 'echo Do B'
end
def (Rake::Task[:b]).needed?
  false
end

desc 'Do C'
task :c do
  sh 'echo Do C'
end

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions