I'm trying to work with raylib 6.0, but it looks like RLAPI already has it's own declaration of static ComputeMD5, which conflicts with the one declared in rres.
A temporary workaround would be to just redeclare either one depending on inclusion order with a different symbol, but I'm pretty sure this isn't intentional.
I'm trying to work with raylib 6.0, but it looks like RLAPI already has it's own declaration of
static ComputeMD5, which conflicts with the one declared in rres.A temporary workaround would be to just redeclare either one depending on inclusion order with a different symbol, but I'm pretty sure this isn't intentional.