I am working with a set of signals of varying magnitude where one signal is very small (and very small variation). Since there seem to be some limitation on the ratio of sides of the rectangle used to calculate the tube (I saw a max statement with 0.0004 in the ratio calculation) this allows really big relative differences of small results.
As I understand the setting of tolerance, it only affects the width of the tube on the x-axis, is there a way to specify the width of the tube on the y-axis instead? Preferably on a signal-to-signal basis (not all signals are small). Or can you improve the tube algorithm, there seems to be an attempt to this in the function 'SetStandardBaseAndRatio' in Modelica_ResultCompare/CurveCompare/TubeSize.cs but for some reason 'SetFormerBaseAndRatio' is used instead.
I am working with a set of signals of varying magnitude where one signal is very small (and very small variation). Since there seem to be some limitation on the ratio of sides of the rectangle used to calculate the tube (I saw a max statement with 0.0004 in the ratio calculation) this allows really big relative differences of small results.
As I understand the setting of tolerance, it only affects the width of the tube on the x-axis, is there a way to specify the width of the tube on the y-axis instead? Preferably on a signal-to-signal basis (not all signals are small). Or can you improve the tube algorithm, there seems to be an attempt to this in the function 'SetStandardBaseAndRatio' in Modelica_ResultCompare/CurveCompare/TubeSize.cs but for some reason 'SetFormerBaseAndRatio' is used instead.