🎯 Repository Quality Improvement Report - Testing #3724
Closed
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
/plan create issue for Task 1 only. Ignore other tasks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 1 week ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🎯 Repository Quality Improvement Report - Testing
Analysis Date: 2025-11-12
Focus Area: Testing
Reused Strategy: No
Executive Summary
The gh-aw repository demonstrates excellent test coverage with a test-to-source ratio of 2.28:1 (130,354 test LOC vs 57,175 source LOC), which is exceptional and indicates comprehensive testing practices. The repository contains 427 Go test files and 45 JavaScript test files, with 1,751 test functions and 17 benchmark tests. However, analysis reveals opportunities for improvement in test organization, missing test coverage for CLI utilities, and enhancing integration test practices.
Key findings include 84 skipped tests that need review, 10+ CLI source files without corresponding test files, and minimal use of parallel testing (only 1 instance of
t.Parallel()). The repository has a solid foundation with 50 integration test files and clear testing documentation in TESTING.md, but could benefit from improved test isolation, better coverage for utility modules, and enhanced test discoverability.Full Analysis Report
Focus Area: Testing
Current State Assessment
The gh-aw repository exhibits strong testing discipline with comprehensive coverage across its codebase. The testing infrastructure is well-organized with clear separation between unit tests, integration tests, and JavaScript tests.
Metrics Collected:
Findings
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
pkg/have tests (36%)Detailed Analysis
Test Coverage Distribution by Package
The
pkg/cliandpkg/workflowpackages contain the bulk of the testing effort, which is appropriate given their complexity. However, smaller utility packages show minimal test coverage.Missing Test Files Analysis
Critical CLI files lacking dedicated test coverage:
mcp_config_file.go- MCP configuration handling (critical functionality)init_command.go- Initialization logic (user-facing)mcp_secrets.go- Secret management (security-critical)mcp_registry_list.go- Registry operationsgit.go- Git integration utilitiescopilot-agents.go- Copilot agent integrationcopilot_setup.go- Setup workflowsadd_command.go- Add command functionalitystatus.go- Status reportingSkipped Tests Concern
With 84 skipped tests, there's a risk of:
Parallel Testing Opportunity
Only 1 instance of
t.Parallel()found across 1,751 test functions. Benefits of parallel testing:Integration Test Organization
50 integration test files indicate strong integration testing practices, but:
🤖 Tasks for Copilot Agent
NOTE TO PLANNER AGENT: The following tasks are designed for GitHub Copilot agent execution. Please split these into individual work items for Claude to process.
Improvement Tasks
The following code regions and tasks should be processed by the Copilot agent. Each section is marked for easy identification by the planner agent.
Task 1: Add Test Coverage for Critical CLI Utilities
Priority: High
Estimated Effort: Large
Focus Area: Testing
Description:
Create comprehensive test coverage for critical CLI utility files that currently lack dedicated test files. These files handle essential functionality including MCP configuration, Git integration, and Copilot agent setup.
Acceptance Criteria:
mcp_config_file_test.gowith tests for MCP configuration reading, writing, and validationmcp_secrets_test.gowith tests for secret extraction, validation, and sanitizationgit_test.gowith tests for Git operations (status, diff, commit detection)copilot_setup_test.gowith tests for Copilot CLI setup and validationinit_command_test.gowith tests for initialization workflowsmake test-unitCode Region:
pkg/cli/*.go(specifically: mcp_config_file.go, mcp_secrets.go, git.go, copilot_setup.go, init_command.go)Task 2: Investigate and Resolve Skipped Tests
Priority: High
Estimated Effort: Medium
Focus Area: Testing
Description:
Review all 84 skipped tests to determine if they represent incomplete work, flaky tests, or legitimately skipped scenarios. Either fix the underlying issues to enable the tests or document why they should remain skipped.
Acceptance Criteria:
Code Region:
**/*_test.go(files containingt.Skiport.SkipNow)Task 3: Enable Parallel Test Execution
Priority: Medium
Estimated Effort: Medium
Focus Area: Testing, Performance
Description:
Refactor test suite to support parallel execution for faster CI/CD pipelines and better test isolation validation. Add
t.Parallel()to all eligible tests and ensure proper test independence.Acceptance Criteria:
t.Parallel()to at least 80% of unit testsCode Region:
**/*_test.go(all test files)Include small, medium, and large test cases for each benchmark.
📊 Historical Context
Previous Focus Areas
🎯 Recommendations
Immediate Actions (This Week)
Short-term Actions (This Month)
Long-term Actions (This Quarter)
📈 Success Metrics
Track these metrics to measure improvement in the Testing focus area:
Next Steps
Generated by Repository Quality Improvement Agent
Next analysis: 2025-11-13 - Focus area will be selected based on diversity algorithm
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions