Is there an existing issue for this?
Package/Plugin version
12.0.0
What you'd like to happen
The following validators were not implemented yet. They are interesting because they are complementary to some of the existent validators.
File validators
String validators
Alternatives you've considered
No response
Aditional information
No response
Is there an existing issue for this?
Package/Plugin version
12.0.0
What you'd like to happen
The following validators were not implemented yet. They are interesting because they are complementary to some of the existent validators.
File validators
Validators.minFileSize(min, base:base): Checks if the field contains a file size that is less than themaxsize withbase1000 or 1024. (complement tomaxFileSize.String validators
Validators.notContains(substring)- Checks if the field does not contain thesubstring. (complementscontains.FormBuilderValidators.notEndsWith()- requires the substring not to be the end of the field's value. (complementsendsWith)FormBuilderValidators.notStartsWith()- requires the substring not to be the start of the field's value. (complementsstartsWith)Validators.hasMaxUppercaseChars(max:max)- Checks if the field has a maximum number of uppercase chars. (complementshasMinUppercaseChars)Validators.hasMaxLowercaseChars(max:max)- Checks if the field has a maximum number of lowercase chars. (complementshasMinLowercaseChars)Validators.hasMaxNumericChars(max:max)- Checks if the field has a maximum number of numeric chars. (complementshasMinNumericChars)Validators.hasMaxSpecialChars(max:max)- Checks if the field has a maximum number of special chars. (complementshasMinSpecialChars)Validators.notMatch(regExp)- Checks if the field does not match with the regular expressionregExp. (complementsmatch)Alternatives you've considered
No response
Aditional information
No response