Why does the rerank model's provider use m.name instead of provider: m.provider

[bthuntergg]

Validations

• I believe this is a way to improve. I'll try to join the Continue Discord for questions
• I'm not able to find an open issue that requests the same enhancement

Problem

Solution

No response

[bthuntergg]

"reranker": {
"name": "ollama",
"params": {
"model": "linux6200/bge-reranker-v2-m3",
"apiBase": "http://localhost:11434"
}
},
这个reranker模型处理效果好，显示是NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

[sestinj]

This is mostly a historical decision, that luckily we have fixed in the config.yaml file format

[bthuntergg]

This is mostly a historical decision, that luckily we have fixed in the config.yaml file format

Can the pycharm version of continue use the config.yaml file format?

[sestinj]

@bthuntergg yes, it can also use config.yaml