Currently, all "builtin" instruction files (currently using .builtins extension) with instruction / implementation pairs, handle these as rough equivalents of DEF. This works most of the time, except that in some cases it would be preferable to avoid recomputing values that are static in nature.
Proposed solution: find a way to have a notation for a semantic equivalent of SET and implement it
Currently, all "builtin" instruction files (currently using
.builtinsextension) with instruction / implementation pairs, handle these as rough equivalents of DEF. This works most of the time, except that in some cases it would be preferable to avoid recomputing values that are static in nature.Proposed solution: find a way to have a notation for a semantic equivalent of SET and implement it