Specifying codeowners?

[kindrowboat]

Looking at #58 (comment), @Smaug123 raises a good point. It doesn't make sense for folks submitting a new template to add themselves as a codeowner unless they're also given commit access to this repo. Would it make more sense to adopt the maintainer's model that nixpkgs uses?

[tomberek]

This repo doesn't quite have a process yet and is relatively low volume. At one point I started iterating on things and working on it routinely, but I have not been consistent. The CODEOWNERS question is a good one. I don't have any strong opinions, nor do I have the access to change accesses.