Add ColumnSelectionDsl.cols(vararg resolvers: ColumnsResolver) overload to help avoid code duplication

[koperagen]

I'd like to be able to refactor code with multiple remove:

.remove { nameStartsWith("local") }
.remove { colsOf<Boolean>().nameStartsWith("has") }
.remove { colsOf<Int>().nameStartsWith("num") }
.remove { modifiers }
.remove { isInitialized and fullyQualifiedName }
.remove { moduleName and path and text }

to singular remove + cols with multiple arbitrary grouped selectors

remove {
  cols(
    nameStartsWith("local"),
    colsOf<Boolean>().nameStartsWith("has"),
    colsOf<Int>().nameStartsWith("num"),
    modifiers,
    isInitialized and fullyQualifiedName,
    moduleName and path and text,
  )
}

What's possible now:

.remove {
    nameStartsWith("local") and
        colsOf<Boolean>().nameStartsWith("has") and
        colsOf<Int>().nameStartsWith("num") and
        modifiers and
        isInitialized and fullyQualifiedName and
        moduleName and path and text
}

[Jolanrensen]

I agree! I miss this too. Currently we only allow cols(vararg ColumnReference<>) and cols(vararg String) (okay and ColumnPath), but this does not allow mixing. And indeed, this and-chain is not very pleasant to work with. We use commas in sentences after all too :)